安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
By your logic SF4 is just SF3 with a 3d engine. You just put some bs together in your brain, post it as it's a given and have no backup your claims. Not one argument or any facts, even if asked.
Best answer so far "I can imagine that it is like i imagine."
SFIV uses Capcom's in-house modded version of the MT Framework game engine.
Meanwhile SFV uses UnrealEngine 4.7.6
How can a person not get tired of being wrong 100% of the time they post?
How are you, not even accidentally right on SOMETHING?
The starting roster was small (16), but it was justified with the understanding that future characters were going to be reasonably earnable with ingame money. With the recent changes in AE, Capcom seems to be waffling on that.
Lies. Lies and more lies.
You believed the fallacy that Capcom told everyone.
Extreme Hell mode on survival has 20,000 FM still, because it's so absurdly difficult. Capcom never to my knowledge said it wouldn't be on there, but the messages went out to most people in the leadup to January 16th, that survival would no longer have FM. It doesn't, for easy, normal and hard. But for Extreme hell mode, yes it does. You can only get colours and character xp from the aforementioned first 3 difficulties.
Not your fault. But it's in there still.
Back to the person point you were quoting; his point stands. The best ways to unlock FM to get those FREE characters, is gone.
So in essence, if you wanted to make the game open to everyone, and level the playing field, technically it's not. You do need to pay to win. That's true of any game. The currency is TIME investing in SKILL BUILDING.
His point stands too...Capcom Cup was won by someone exploiting a very powerful character nobody else in the worlds elite bracket at FGC events was using (Birdie). He did it so well he beat 3 of the worlds best players...barely, but he beat Xian, Daigo and Tokid. MenaRD did so because the matchups and character usage is KEY to winning.
He'll lose his advantage this year. More people will watch him and he'll have to peform irrespective. You can't beat what you don't know or practice against. Considering the wolds number 1 ranked player uses Birdie, 2 of those 3 should have been prepared as that bloke is Japanese...but, the OP's point stands. You do have to PAY to win.
But his loses out on whether this system is UNFAIR. It's not. LAN competitive play is extremely fair. For some the economic argument comes into play (but that is more about travel to events). There are pletny of players who save money on using pad over a fightstick...which PAYS (costs) more to buy?
Fight stick. Don't fret. Someone won Evo on pad. Once.
You really don't see things clearly do you? It's like you're blind to rational thinking. It's quite...alarming. Your point stood but for a different reason. The OP is correct. There is a pay to GAME system, but not a PAY to WIN system. In real competition, the game is very fair. It always has been.
The meta game doesn't need fixing. It's the structure around it that's a mess (netcode and ranked matchmaking). The in fight stuff is very sound and well designed. Always has been. It's why people see competition footage and WANT to play. If it were OP and one sided, people would notice and refuse to buy. But it isn't. It's quite a large game just like SFIV and a fair one at that once the biased factors get removed (they always do in person 1 on 1).
Is this true?
Can someone verify this?
I didn't disagree with that.
Enough of that semantic ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
When some asks "is it Pay 2 Win" literally NO ONE is asking "how much time is required to get good"
People come one, you can just will nilly redefine any term you want to suit your argument, this is completely asinine.
The million topics i see about Dictator, Laura, Birdie winning Capcom Cup, and etc say otherwise.
Go learn what P2W is before arguing.
It means literally want it says, Pay to Win. You can't win unless you pay money.
This is not figurative or abstract, it's literal.
And this isn't the case for SFV, it's not P2W
You can just will nilly redefine any term you want to suit your argument, this is completely asinine.
As a wise jedi said:
Amazing. Every word of what you just said was wrong.
Dont change 9th
which categorically is not the case in SFV.
You still lose.
All of you dumbasses that don't know word definitions, go ahead and buy all the DLC, all of it, and tell me how it made you beat every player that didn't.
Simple, easy.
Until you comeback with your results, GTFO.
I wouldn't say it's pay to win, but it's probably pay to practice if you don't unlock the DLC characters.