Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- Use food
- Dont stay in red, kite or block charged attacks
- Dont forget about your debuffs
- Use dual wield, just spam blodthirst and keep blood craze on her
- Keep leeching strikes buff for health and stamina regen
- Use suprise attack in your rotation for shadow barrier procs if learned
- Dont spam execution of killer's blade mindless
We get that you have a tiny ♥♥♥♥ and have to pretend like a quest you clearly never even attempted is easy for you, but that doesn't really help anyone.
A phrase like "she ain't nothing" is ambiguous in English grammar, depending on the register. Formally it constitutes a double negative and would thus indicate that Trigger was aware that the content was difficult, and therefore offered help. However, you could also interpret it as slang, a register where (in English) double negation is sometimes used as a stronger form of a simple negation - which would indicate that Trigger was indeed calling the content easy.
Since we cannot be 100% sure of the intended meaning, especially so in a forum with lots of non-native speakers, I would be careful about launching a personal attack based on such ambiguous information. Hence I wrote a short reply in the hope that the attacker realizes the ambiguity of the statement they replied to. I have seen misunderstandings about double negation in English many, many times (again, especially in places where non-native speakers are active).
So which grammatical information should I check in your opinion?