Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Yeah, that's not what I said. We all know it has performance problems and bugs, that's why it's EARLY ACCESS. If you want to wait for a polished 1.0 level product, just wait for a polished 1.0 release. Wait to read reviews.
Early access is for folks that know they're going to get something that is unfinished, and are okay with it. Sort yourself appropriately.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3408849525
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3408849550
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3408849572
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3408849593
7800X3D/4090 using Virtual Desktop (High, 90hz), with some tweaks in OpenXR Toolkit to cut down the FoV, enable Fixed Foveated Rendering, and downsample the resolution a bit.
There is no FSR or DLSS, I'll try those later. Most settings are around the mid to high level, except for grass, which is all the way off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkCWCzB2vkk
GPU: RTX 4080 Super
VR HMD: Pimax Crystal
ACC FPS on medium settings: 90+ FPS
AC Evo FPS on very low settings: 30-40 fps
Like, come on. Really hope this new graphics engine can be significantly optimized in future updates. Because if not, I won't be buying this game again (submitted a refund).
i know this is still very very early access (why though, why not just cook for another year), but i dont think this game is going to sell well, which is crazy, because it could have been massive for sim racing. as it is i think most people will just stay with assetto corsa 1.
give it a year or two though, and we will see. by then it might be out of early access and if so we might be getting mod support which might fix some of the issues.
Ryzen 7 5800x
HP Reverb G2
Artefacts in studio/main menu in 3D scene.
If FSR is enabled, artefacts everywhere.
Have to disable FSR for remotely playable. 30-40fps on mostly medium. Can get it to 60+ but everything is low and looks like arse.
Hopefully will improve alot. ACC performs pretty good and if very playable @ 60-80fps.
at least this, from my understanding, used forward rendering, so its actually possible for them to optimize it for vr, which it wasnt for ea wrc. i am still very very skeptical though. if a 4090 is struggling. the rest of us normies are fkd.
It's absolute rubbish at the moment, the devs should have said it's coming later.
ACC is terrible for me in VR, whereas AC looks so crisp and clean. I think it's due to the UE engine they used in ACC, doesn't mix well with VR.
https://youtu.be/O_mJ81PyfVg
Why it's side-by-side I don't know. But it's glitchy and unplayable with FSR. Without, 30-40fps but still a bit glitchy with screen updates or head moves quickly.