Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
To be honest, NASA while doing the Mercury Program would have loved that graphics card ;) So maybe OP does have a point that you need a NASA PC, but preferably one that has been used since at least the Space Shuttle Program ended :)
Sorry, this made me laugh, thanks OP
NASA's 'Plaiedes' actually ranks #7 on the top 500 list of most powerful computers, it debuted at #3 in 2008.
This "lowest bidder" rhetoric that people love to claim (as if they have any insight) is so tiresome. The rest of the sentence is "lowest bidder than can meet the project requirements." NASA will spec their "PC's" for whatever the intended application will be, many of which will be computationally demanding. I promise they ALL know more than you.