AMD Graphics user... more problems than nvidia?

[TurbasoSimracing]

5700xt user, can t play even at single screen 50fps

[mikeyhedison]

Had a 2060 RTX, played crap. Bought a 4070 super, plays ace. CPU is a Ryzen 7 5700X3d. All on ultra. get about 70-80 FPS. Goes a bit sketchy with a lot of AI, but, not massively.

[arsenalfanrichi]

I'm on 7800xt, granted a bit more powerful than 5700xt, but I haven't had any frame issues. I've been running game maxed, but not tried juiced with full grid of AI. I had no problems running Grid of AI with the default medium settings I think it was, before going back to solo cos of AI wrecking me in fast straight braking zones lol

Do you have any Adrenalin settings active that might be hurting your performance? It could also be that drivers are not refined yet, being Early Access.

[Lud1crous]

Originally posted by mikeyhedison:

Had a 2060 RTX, played crap. Bought a 4070 super, plays ace. CPU is a Ryzen 7 5700X3d. All on ultra. get about 70-80 FPS. Goes a bit sketchy with a lot of AI, but, not massively.

only 70-80fps lol

[ianriches]

I've got a 7800 X3D / 7900 XTX.

With everything on Ultra and 20 AI / daytime dry race / me at the back of the grid, I get just under 60 fps at the start, which quickly climbs to 80-90 fps+ as the race settles down.

I'm "old school", and still remember the thrill of finally getting a steady 36 fps in GPL, so that's enough for me.

However...

About 50% of the time I get graphical corruption. From reading here, that seems to be "normal" for AMD GPU users.

[arsenalfanrichi]

Originally posted by ianriches:

I've got a 7800 X3D / 7900 XTX.

With everything on Ultra and 20 AI / daytime dry race / me at the back of the grid, I get just under 60 fps at the start, which quickly climbs to 80-90 fps+ as the race settles down.

I'm "old school", and still remember the thrill of finally getting a steady 36 fps in GPL, so that's enough for me.

However...

About 50% of the time I get graphical corruption. From reading here, that seems to be "normal" for AMD GPU users.

There is some visual artifacting on some textures, It does seem to be an AMD issue, not sure whether the driver or the program will be patched first

[Darvick]

i get black and white boxes over all walls boards and signs 50% of the time when i load a track im on RX 7800

[MARSHALL_lowell]

i have
cpu intel 10400f
gpu 6650xt
16gb ram 3000mhz
i cant play, the game go at 30fps only with amd frame generetor

[pants]

7600X tuned so all cores run at 5.25 Ghz.

GFX card is a 6700XT undervolted

32GB DDR5 6000 ram.(with tight timings)

Run medium/low and have 60fps @1080p with a 20 car grid.

GPU runs 98% load and the CPU runs at 15% load. Give Kunos time.
Its just the start of the second week of early access release.

[goblueteam]

Im on a i5-13600k rx6800 and I think the 6000 series might have less of the artifacting.

Still not really seeing the performance I would expect though with FPS. Occasionally I will see something very small...
-front bumper on honda s2000 had some black glitching very small area....mazda mx-5 steering wheel had some tiny black spots that did not move like the wheel moved behind them.

I wouldnt say its like the worst performance ever just bad compared to ACC and well all the other sim racing titles ive played really lol-ACC used to be considered a hardware hog lol...

4k medium preset with quality FSR I can get a 60-70 fps experience with 16 AI the start of the race is still like 50-60 fps for a few seconds
-same settings on ACC is like 130+ fps and 130 is the low...usually more like 150-160.
I turn up many settings on ACC to high or epic until im around 100-120 fps.

1440p I really didnt get like some giant leap in performance and staying at native resolution was still dropping below 60 fps so FSR still needed more or less means its not worth dropping to 1440p in my opinion.....on ACC 1440p is like 150-190 fps.

I dont think the settings really scale as good in AC evo it seems like a ton of lighting and shadow effects are happening even on the medium preset-didnt test low or very low much I felt like it didnt help the FPS much.

Also dont forget to lower your resolution you need to change it in windows display settings for the full pc not just in the game menu or it will not actually stick.

So you could try putting your pc at a lower resolution and trying again...that could mean 720p for some people and that is crazy.

I think it will get better with time but it is actually very shocking to me-as the performance is very low compared to everything else ive played.

[echopolvo]

I'm rx6800 xt user and it works perfectly, no issues even with vr

[arsenalfanrichi]

Originally posted by goblueteam:

Im on a i5-13600k rx6800 and I think the 6000 series might have less of the artifacting.

Still not really seeing the performance I would expect though with FPS. Occasionally I will see something very small...
-front bumper on honda s2000 had some black glitching very small area....mazda mx-5 steering wheel had some tiny black spots that did not move like the wheel moved behind them.

I wouldnt say its like the worst performance ever just bad compared to ACC and well all the other sim racing titles ive played really lol-ACC used to be considered a hardware hog lol...

4k medium preset with quality FSR I can get a 60-70 fps experience with 16 AI the start of the race is still like 50-60 fps for a few seconds
-same settings on ACC is like 130+ fps and 130 is the low...usually more like 150-160.
I turn up many settings on ACC to high or epic until im around 100-120 fps.

1440p I really didnt get like some giant leap in performance and staying at native resolution was still dropping below 60 fps so FSR still needed more or less means its not worth dropping to 1440p in my opinion.....on ACC 1440p is like 150-190 fps.

I dont think the settings really scale as good in AC evo it seems like a ton of lighting and shadow effects are happening even on the medium preset-didnt test low or very low much I felt like it didnt help the FPS much.

Also dont forget to lower your resolution you need to change it in windows display settings for the full pc not just in the game menu or it will not actually stick.

So you could try putting your pc at a lower resolution and trying again...that could mean 720p for some people and that is crazy.

I think it will get better with time but it is actually very shocking to me-as the performance is very low compared to everything else ive played.

I respect that you've actually eloquated your response. We need more people in the forums like you, rather than childish insults and vague comments about why it's bad.

[Trezoitao38]

Originally posted by goblueteam:

Im on a i5-13600k rx6800 and I think the 6000 series might have less of the artifacting.

Still not really seeing the performance I would expect though with FPS. Occasionally I will see something very small...
-front bumper on honda s2000 had some black glitching very small area....mazda mx-5 steering wheel had some tiny black spots that did not move like the wheel moved behind them.

I wouldnt say its like the worst performance ever just bad compared to ACC and well all the other sim racing titles ive played really lol-ACC used to be considered a hardware hog lol...

4k medium preset with quality FSR I can get a 60-70 fps experience with 16 AI the start of the race is still like 50-60 fps for a few seconds
-same settings on ACC is like 130+ fps and 130 is the low...usually more like 150-160.
I turn up many settings on ACC to high or epic until im around 100-120 fps.

1440p I really didnt get like some giant leap in performance and staying at native resolution was still dropping below 60 fps so FSR still needed more or less means its not worth dropping to 1440p in my opinion.....on ACC 1440p is like 150-190 fps.

I dont think the settings really scale as good in AC evo it seems like a ton of lighting and shadow effects are happening even on the medium preset-didnt test low or very low much I felt like it didnt help the FPS much.

Also dont forget to lower your resolution you need to change it in windows display settings for the full pc not just in the game menu or it will not actually stick.

So you could try putting your pc at a lower resolution and trying again...that could mean 720p for some people and that is crazy.

I think it will get better with time but it is actually very shocking to me-as the performance is very low compared to everything else ive played.

And that is true, AC EVO is the worse racing simulator now in GPU performance.

[arsenalfanrichi]

Originally posted by Trezoitao38:

Originally posted by goblueteam:

Im on a i5-13600k rx6800 and I think the 6000 series might have less of the artifacting.

Still not really seeing the performance I would expect though with FPS. Occasionally I will see something very small...
-front bumper on honda s2000 had some black glitching very small area....mazda mx-5 steering wheel had some tiny black spots that did not move like the wheel moved behind them.

I wouldnt say its like the worst performance ever just bad compared to ACC and well all the other sim racing titles ive played really lol-ACC used to be considered a hardware hog lol...

4k medium preset with quality FSR I can get a 60-70 fps experience with 16 AI the start of the race is still like 50-60 fps for a few seconds
-same settings on ACC is like 130+ fps and 130 is the low...usually more like 150-160.
I turn up many settings on ACC to high or epic until im around 100-120 fps.

1440p I really didnt get like some giant leap in performance and staying at native resolution was still dropping below 60 fps so FSR still needed more or less means its not worth dropping to 1440p in my opinion.....on ACC 1440p is like 150-190 fps.

I dont think the settings really scale as good in AC evo it seems like a ton of lighting and shadow effects are happening even on the medium preset-didnt test low or very low much I felt like it didnt help the FPS much.

Also dont forget to lower your resolution you need to change it in windows display settings for the full pc not just in the game menu or it will not actually stick.

So you could try putting your pc at a lower resolution and trying again...that could mean 720p for some people and that is crazy.

I think it will get better with time but it is actually very shocking to me-as the performance is very low compared to everything else ive played.

And that is true, AC EVO is the worse racing simulator now in GPU performance.

I'll play Devil's advocate and suggest that graphics optimisations are probably scheduled later on in the EA roadmap.

[sege64]

Ryzen 5600X, 16GB Ram, AMD 5600XT, have to run the game at 720p or 1080p windowed, changing my native res in order to get the game to load without crashing (still crashes sometimes) and then get around 55-60fps with no AI cars obviously not in the rain!
In other words, not seriously playable.

Really hoping for some major optimization, which I think should happen, that's recommended specs after all, and everything on very low (looks utterly awful).

I've read reports of the game using 15GB of VRAM which sounds nuts so surely that will be improved, and is only one way performance should be improved.

Still waiting for some patches to see where it all lands because apparently if i got a GPU that could run it well, I'd be CPU bound, meaning practically a whole new pc needed just to run this sim.

I used to run 60fps with vysnc in sims and put up with the input lag, until I discovered the performance FSR and give and then ran everything low in order to get 120+fps in ACC which is the new target. To hell with the pretties, I just want the frames to allow for smooth no tearing no input lag simulation driving. That currently seems a long way off with EVO.

[vipcelly]

I'm running a pretty basic setup. Nothing crazy. Rx6800, ryzen 7 5700x3d and 32 gb ram. The game runs great on high settings. I'm getting around 80+ fps with 30 ai. On ultra around 60fps.
Getting some odd lines on the main screen though on the garage walls on the left. Not sure what's up with that.