DLSS 4 and Multi Frame Generation

[jfx]

It would be amazing to play on 5120 x 1440 resolution at 240 Hz and 60 FPS base using 4 x frame generation with new 5000 series cards.

[gimlikos84]

12K and 2000Fps would be the best

[Max 1987]

DLSS is upscaling , no true 4K so stop with DLSS and FSR trash

[jfx]

Originally posted by Max 1987:

DLSS is upscaling , no true 4K so stop with DLSS and FSR trash

The "true" 4K still requires anti-aliasing for realistic graphics which does not work well with sharp edges. I like how DLSS with quality setting looks in most games and it is even better now with the new transformer model.

[jfx]

Actually the base target for Multi Frame Generation should be ~80 FPS to achieve true 60 FPS base for 4 x frame generation. Has Kunos confirmed the support yet?

[gabrynet83]

Originally posted by Max 1987:

DLSS is upscaling , no true 4K so stop with DLSS and FSR trash

Please don't start that fight DLSS vs Raster. Enjoy the best settings you can with the tech your video card allows.
As long as we are not able to spot any difference between raster and upscaled (DLSS / FSR) who cares ...

My PC is quite old and I'm using a 1070, with FSR i gain a little fps boost.
Now ... if I want to spot issues with FSR well ... it's quite sh_tty in the showroom since I can spot tons of ghosting like artifacts which are not when FSR is disabled ... but while driving I don't stop the game to see the artifacts ... the whole looks great.

Now if you can afford a 50XX series and you will be able to boost your FPS 3-4x via the new Multi Frame Gen with no or barely noticeable artifacts while driving, I believe the benefits are more than the cons, so to justify the usage of the tech.

This fight against AI upscaled techs are not understandable to me.