Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Hint: Hobbs is dead either way, You pus, he-dies right away. You pull, he is going to bleed out anyway. No surgeons on GBI...
In a medical training sense, medical ethics dictate to try and safe a patients life once they come into your care, however, in war/survival situation, you have to make triage decisions to preserve and aquire resources for members of your team.. I was just hoping I'd get the knife afterwards, and leaving Hobbs to his fate, whatever the case may be..
In the game's context, I imagine it's one of those moral dilemmas, based on good/bad choices, i.e. "there are 2 wolves that battle in each of us, good and evil; which one wins? The one you feed.."
Pretty piss poor decision on the development's part. If they were worried about balance, they could've lowered its durability drastically (~10% or so).
Instead, they chose to do something silly. Sometimes, I wonder what goes on in a person's head to lead to such illogical, lazy decisions.