Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The idea that one has to stave off hunger is a fallacy. Our evolutionary design is well suited to periodic fasting. Modern humans gorging on refined carbohydrate ladden junk food, which is designed to increase appetite, suffer the pangs of hunger more strongly. Nevertheless, after several days of discomfort and adjustment, it is entirely possible to enter a normal fasting metabolic state.
Notice how dehyration has a much greater effect on condition than starvation, but even still, if you were starving, you probably wouldn't say you were 100%
This is the point that I feel should be made, essentially. In the situation the PC finds themselves in, they should be more worried about shelter, warmth, water and predators than their food consumption.
I think it's much more difficult to get away with this in a cold environment. Not only does your metabolism slow down but as you lose insulation as you lose fat. That means you would become colder at an exponential rate. I also think a more realistic body fat composition would be 12-15%. A person with 25% body fat would be less mobile than your average healthy adult, and they would lose weight very quickly.
I do agree that calories are burned very quickly in this game, but on the other hand it's quite easy to exploit "starvation mode" where you only lose 1% health per hour but you can still do unlimited manual labor without burning any calories. They need to find some middle ground where I can eat food a slower and more sustainable rate.
I think you might have crunched a few wrong numbers there, but generally speaking, humans can survive a good while without food before starvation sets in.
Body fat isn't as practical in that regard, especially in a cold environment where you lose most of your body heat through your head, ears, hands, feet, etc (i.e, places with very low BF%).
Also has anyone seen the cattails?! Light weight and calories aren't that bad, you find 6 and it weighs the same as a Pork n' Beans, but has 2x the calories, and you get tinder ontop of it. Pretty damn cool.
I agree with agrinja on this one.
I do think it's high at the moment, but I would be very wary of a significant change.
Edit: Sleeping and other idle activities seem to burn too much.