Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
After finding the hunter's revolver, I'm so disappointed with the iron sights. Why two single posts inline? This may seem to non-firearms people to be more precise, but its not, in practice. This is not a good design. Iron sights work by lining up the top of the front post w the rear ("equal height"), thus lining up the barrel on the vertical axis, and keeping the front post centered in the rear sight ("equal light"). With two posts in line, in theory, you can line up the barrel, but the rear sight post will occlude the front sight post, particularly when its higher than the front sight. Similarly, its easier visually to center a post with equal negative space on each side than to line two posts together horizontally.
If you wanted to make the hunter's revolver look like its supposed to be accurate at distance, you probably want to go with a finer front post so it occludes less of the target at distance, and narrow the rear sight post so you're comparing smaller gaps of negative space to each other. Alternatively, you could use a peep sight with a rear peep and fine front post.
God ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ damn it makes me happy to see someone actually using proper terminology/actually knowing what the ♥♥♥♥ they're talking about when it comes to guns.