How to disable battleye in private server ?

[Fuchslein]

i mean, i want that my private server doesn't require battleye, becaus its affect so much the fps of my friends

[dot-._]

Type +insecure instead of +internetserver or +lanserver

[Cursed Hawkins]

BattlEye is not the problem of your friends experiencing FPS issues that would be the Unity Engine that is causing the problem

[Northern Epsilon]

Open config.json in the server folder.

The option should be somewhere at the top of the file.

[Fuchslein]

Originally posted by Cryptos.jpg (Northern Epsilon):

Open config.json in the server folder.

The option should be somewhere at the top of the file.

Thanks, it worked

[r.linder]

I have a feeling that FPS isn't why Zed wants to turn off BattlEye, but more likely to use something that BattlEye is meant to detect, as an anti-cheat program doesn't affect FPS in the slightest bit.

[dot-._]

It does. It requires more of of your processor and that slows down your render rate as well as other things.

Im a computer engineer

[Noah_Food_Reviews]

open json file and in top lines u see

"battleye secure": true

change true to false to set it off

[76561198154138948]

Originally posted by Hippo Trading Mythical For CSGO:

It does. It requires more of of your processor and that slows down your render rate as well as other things.

Im a computer engineer

Your not wrong, BE runs a low level scanner service that constantly monitors processes/memory and disk contents/access.
On a slower PC with mechanical drives this will most defiantly effect FPS.
Add to that contention with anti-virus, anti-mal and firewalls and your overhead goes up dramatically on the client side.

Truly its server hosts choice as to what level security they want to run on their servers.
As long as a control system exits to "keep em separated" its not a issue.
The hack vs legit argument is a mute point, so time some of you got off your high horses on that.

[ZEKE420]

Read the FAQ of Nelson about this.

[egarcia1360]

On some computers the FPS is barely, if at all, affected, but on some slower computers it can be really detrimental.

[r.linder]

Originally posted by Hippo Trading Mythical For CSGO:

It does. It requires more of of your processor and that slows down your render rate as well as other things.

Im a computer engineer

Most, if not all modern processors will not have any issues running BattlEye, so the difference is insignifcant unless you're running a computer that's at least 10 years old. If you are, consider chunking it into a shredder and getting a new one, because that's ridiculously outdated.

I'm using a 4th generation i3, there's literally no difference for my computer, and 4th gen i3s came out at least 2 years ago.

[76561198154138948]

Originally posted by Escorve:

Originally posted by Hippo Trading Mythical For CSGO:

It does. It requires more of of your processor and that slows down your render rate as well as other things.

Im a computer engineer

Most, if not all modern processors will not have any issues running BattlEye, so the difference is insignifcant unless you're running a computer that's at least 10 years old. If you are, consider chunking it into a shredder and getting a new one, because that's ridiculously outdated.

I'm using a 4th generation i3, there's literally no difference for my computer, and 4th gen i3s came out at least 2 years ago.

Actually the biggest BE problem comes from disk storage if you have 24tb of data on analog drives its wants to test all of that in background and that a large overhead.
200gb on ssd and its over in a flash.

[r.linder]

Originally posted by WeAreLegionOne:

Originally posted by Escorve:

Most, if not all modern processors will not have any issues running BattlEye, so the difference is insignifcant unless you're running a computer that's at least 10 years old. If you are, consider chunking it into a shredder and getting a new one, because that's ridiculously outdated.

I'm using a 4th generation i3, there's literally no difference for my computer, and 4th gen i3s came out at least 2 years ago.

Actually the biggest BE problem comes from disk storage if you have 24tb of data on analog drives its wants to test all of that in background and that a large overhead.
200gb on ssd and its over in a flash.

Most people have 500~750 GB hdd space at most, so that's not even relevant...

[76561198154138948]

Originally posted by Escorve:

Originally posted by WeAreLegionOne:

Actually the biggest BE problem comes from disk storage if you have 24tb of data on analog drives its wants to test all of that in background and that a large overhead.
200gb on ssd and its over in a flash.

Most people have 500~750 GB hdd space at most, so that's not even relevant...

Relevant is the fact that there are issues using BE at this point I'm just pointing out some of the potential factors involved.

[r.linder]

Originally posted by WeAreLegionOne:

Originally posted by Escorve:

Most people have 500~750 GB hdd space at most, so that's not even relevant...

Relevant is the fact that there are issues using BE at this point I'm just pointing out some of the potential factors involved.

Potential, but not likely. The most likely cause of most of the problems is because it was newly integrated; it's bound to have bugs.