Dont understand why ppl complain about P2P so much

[HUH]

As the title say, after reading all this posts about the p2p system and that connection sucks and lags etc... i decide not to buy this game.
But my wife make me a little gift log in to steam and buy it for me during my work time xD
So i was forced to give it a try.
After 8 hours playtime ... i had maybe 3 disconnections or lags etc in my MP Games.
Well ... if you like 4v4 Deathmatch there will be more in that timeframe for sure, but i'm not the type of guy who want to be gang.bangd when a teammate die early and you get rushd 2v1 or 3v1.
The Game really shines in 1v1 Mode (in my eyes) and i had only positive experience with it. Some ppl give me tips to do better next time.

[FerroBorne]

until you face some1 with strict nat ( ingame ) their lag will affect you. I forgot to record the video but you'll see it yourself 1 day ( if you meet a guy with really bad internet ).
the game is really good, i love this game BUT the fact still remain that Ubisuck need to update their servers or more and more players gonna quit the game.

[Fenixy]

'cause it's trendy to hate things.

[HUH]

Well you'r right. I think they need to fix that. But what i mean with my post was, that it isn't that often what some ppl here say. I can deal with it if it happen from time to time. Maybe some others not. But i agree ... it needs a fix

[Niceboy]

Fail

[abexomotron]

If you see red or disconnected symbols when youre in character selection then 99% it will be laggy.
Wierd enough most of the time all the players with China Flag emblem have red connection. I don't know why.

[Andysan]

Peer to Peer from a networking standpoint is very old, unstable and unsecure. It's a lot easier to hack and be malicious in quite a few ways. From a $60+ AAA title you'd expect dedicated servers where you fix almost all the other issues with Peer to Peer connections.

Peer to Peer is also WAY cheaper to produce and manage than Dedicated servers. Ubisoft went cheap on us, no denying that and I'd like to think I'd be safe to say the majority of the community would WANT Dedicated servers.

[Panic Fire]

Originally posted by Sir Andrew™:

Peer to Peer from a networking standpoint is very old, unstable and unsecure. It's a lot easier to hack and be malicious in quite a few ways. From a $60+ AAA title you'd expect dedicated servers where you fix almost all the other issues with Peer to Peer connections.

Peer to Peer is also WAY cheaper to produce and manage than Dedicated servers. Ubisoft went cheap on us, no denying that and I'd like to think I'd be safe to say the majority of the community would WANT Dedicated servers.

Fighting games don't work well on a dedicated server, infact any games with strict timing's don't work very well on servers.

[verarticus]

Originally posted by Sir Andrew™:

Peer to Peer from a networking standpoint is very old, unstable and unsecure. It's a lot easier to hack and be malicious in quite a few ways. From a $60+ AAA title you'd expect dedicated servers where you fix almost all the other issues with Peer to Peer connections.

Peer to Peer is also WAY cheaper to produce and manage than Dedicated servers. Ubisoft went cheap on us, no denying that and I'd like to think I'd be safe to say the majority of the community would WANT Dedicated servers.

But it's not Standard Peer 2 Peer is the thing, yeah there are some issues but the stuff that really was an issue, isn't an issue here. But people don't care, P2P was done poorly before so it clearly can't be done better amiright? (no)

Also servers have their own slew of problems, don't even act like they're a pure upgrade lol.

[Andysan]

The only reason why they don't have dedicated is because it's more expensive plain and simple, way more expensive also the players per game don't really require a dedicatd server. Maxs for a game is 8 players. Peer to Peer usually works fine with a smaller number like that. Strict timings can get messed up with P2P or dedicated, that's not even a relevent point.

[Raidden]

Originally posted by Fenixy:

'cause it's trendy to hate things.

It is also trendy to be human. It doesnt mean there is reason for it.

[suilles]

Originally posted by Panic Fire:

Originally posted by Sir Andrew™:

Peer to Peer from a networking standpoint is very old, unstable and unsecure. It's a lot easier to hack and be malicious in quite a few ways. From a $60+ AAA title you'd expect dedicated servers where you fix almost all the other issues with Peer to Peer connections.

Peer to Peer is also WAY cheaper to produce and manage than Dedicated servers. Ubisoft went cheap on us, no denying that and I'd like to think I'd be safe to say the majority of the community would WANT Dedicated servers.

Fighting games don't work well on a dedicated server, infact any games with strict timing's don't work very well on servers.

Overwatch got a dedicated server right? (I'm not sure) even if it's P2P but so far I never seen a problem there... so the problem isn't with a server if they can find a way then should ubisoft

[StaticFrenetic]

Man, hundreds of people are like, "There is a fire on the other side of the city!"

And you are like, "I can't see a fire from my window, what are you all complaining about?"

Doesn't mean there isn't a fire on the other side of the city.

[HUH]

Make love not War :)
But i still suck with Peacekeeper 55-60% win rate in 1v1

[Ennyweeny]

Originally posted by Mr Blake:

As the title say, after reading all this posts about the p2p system and that connection sucks and lags etc... i decide not to buy this game.
But my wife make me a little gift log in to steam and buy it for me during my work time xD
So i was forced to give it a try.
After 8 hours playtime ... i had maybe 3 disconnections or lags etc in my MP Games.
Well ... if you like 4v4 Deathmatch there will be more in that timeframe for sure, but i'm not the type of guy who want to be gang.bangd when a teammate die early and you get rushd 2v1 or 3v1.
The Game really shines in 1v1 Mode (in my eyes) and i had only positive experience with it. Some ppl give me tips to do better next time.

Well i'm sorry to say but 2v2s and 4v4s are the most popular gamemodes, the fact that you sit in 1v1s doesn't make the loss of progress and time OK. In fact, it's a defective product, it doesn't work as it was advertised. Now when they make an online ONLY game, then they really should have dedicated servers, a braindead monkey is able to see as much.

Maybe try bettering yourself as a person, you self-centered douchebag.

[HUH]

Originally posted by Ennyweeny:

Originally posted by Mr Blake:

As the title say, after reading all this posts about the p2p system and that connection sucks and lags etc... i decide not to buy this game.
But my wife make me a little gift log in to steam and buy it for me during my work time xD
So i was forced to give it a try.
After 8 hours playtime ... i had maybe 3 disconnections or lags etc in my MP Games.
Well ... if you like 4v4 Deathmatch there will be more in that timeframe for sure, but i'm not the type of guy who want to be gang.bangd when a teammate die early and you get rushd 2v1 or 3v1.
The Game really shines in 1v1 Mode (in my eyes) and i had only positive experience with it. Some ppl give me tips to do better next time.

Well i'm sorry to say but 2v2s and 4v4s are the most popular gamemodes, the fact that you sit in 1v1s doesn't make the loss of progress and time OK. In fact, it's a defective product, it doesn't work as it was advertised. Now when they make an online ONLY game, then they really should have dedicated servers, a braindead monkey is able to see as much.

Maybe try bettering yourself as a person, you self-centered douchebag.

Wohoo Salty. I say alrdy that in 4v4 will be more Lags, Disconnects etc... as in a 1v1.
And i just give my oppinion about the Game where i play a lot of 1v1.
So dont judge my personality, and maybe you should be working on yourself when i read such offensive words like '' you self-centered ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ''
Keep it ez bro it is just a Game