Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You cannot compare game sizes. Not by amount of playtime, not by size of the world, not by graphics quality, not even by texture resolutions. Badly optimised does not suit either, as size is not about optimization in times where 2 TB HDDs hardly cost anything at all.
And it is not a port of a ps1 game either. It is a port of a gamecube game, which was about 4.5 GB.
All is takes is little-compressed audio or video and voilà, big game size.
Are you stupid? This is not a port of a PS1 game.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_optical_discs
Not many of us have desktops rigged like servers. Try looking at the Steam hardware survey results.
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey
Edit: And it says that...
"over 10TB"
holy-♥♥♥♥♥♥♥-ololololololol