There is no reason to remake RE1 again...

[Shocker]

Capcom had an interview on summer and they said that it's not laughable to Remake RE1 again. In my opinion there is no point to remake this game again, they already remade it once and they even remastered the remake for modern systems, added achievements, cloud saves, and new controls. This game is perfect as it is, I would want Capcom to rather focus on making new games, and push the franchise forward rather than remake every game they have. Same goes to RE4. Just finished that game recently again and it aged very well, with the HD textures and the modern control scheme. The only games that need a remake after RE2 is RE3 and maybe Code Veronica. I know that the OTS fanboys would love a RE1 Remake in that style, but do we really need every game to be the same?? I mean come on people, this is getting ridiculous... If there will be another RE1 Remake it's 100% that I'm NOT going to buy it.
https://screenrant.com/resident-evil-remake-game-remake-capcom/

[TheHuskyGT]

My only problem with RE1Remake is the lack of higher resolutions and some backgrounds not even getting a facelift from the gamecube version. RE0 got the full remaster treatment, with most if not all backgrounds upscaled, resolutions up to 4K and unlimited frames. Don't see why Capcom half baked it with RE1.

It's not a gamebreaker, but I wish they made it a bit more consistent. As for a remake REMAKE, I don't think it needs it, but I I wouldn't complain if we got yet another way to play the classic.

[Glaston]

Disagree strongly. I want full 3D remakes of them all! I'm a fan since the original. 1996.
IMO, the RE2 and RE3 remakes are the way these stories should be told. The old school RE, that's only how it is because of tech limitations at the time. I don't like those limitations. I never did.
I overlooked them because it was a small price to pay for the content, and I understood why it had to be that way.. But you don't emulate them in a modern port of the game when you don't have to.
I like the RE1 HD Remaster, it's classic RE and then some. It's light years away from the RE2 Remake though.
It just is.An the RE3 Remake was even better. It's short, too short, I agree. And there's elements I wish it had, and elements I wish it didn't have.
Look what it offers in place though. It's incredible!
That's the new RE franchise. I say keep it coming! I'll pay for it all day long. And so will the rest of you. You'll deny it though.

[Shocker]

Publicado originalmente por Dreadstar666:

F**k anybody who stands against RE1 getting another remake. What are you? F*gg*ts? The Gamecube remake was brilliant, yes. I loved it, I played the sh*t out of it, I still own the mother f**ker to this day and pick it up when I need a good zombie fix. But even after the HD remaster the backgrounds remain fuzzy and highly undetailed, not to mention 2 DIMENSIONAL. 2D is extinct my friends. If you still make games in 2D, get the f**k out of the gaming business because everybody hates you. Get with the Godd*mn times. The ONLY thing they remastered in the REmake remaster were the characters. They look absolutely crisp and clear but completely out of place against the blurry 2D environment. The lighting makes them ALMOST look like they are really in the scenes, but almost doesn't count. Ultimately 3D characters in a 2D world DO NOT WORK! I came from a long history of video gaming all the way back to the original Nintendo. When graphics evolve, so do game titles worthy of being remade with those evolved graphics. And never has there been a title more worthy than Resident Evil. The REmake on Gamecube was indeed perfect, for its time. Now even a remaster doesn't pull it properly from the grave. I would love to see it remade in the same fashion as RE2 and RE3. RE4 made that view and play style a staple and no Resident Evil game has strayed very far since. So the guy who made this post needs to pull the mighty huge and thorny stick from his uptight rectum and renounce his claim to being a Resident Evil fan. I'm serious. If you really hate the idea of a RE1 re-remake then you are NOT a true RE fan. I have spoken.

You want another remake so than you can jerk off to the graphics? The HD remaster holds up amazingly well, it even looks better than both revelations game combine. We don't need an RE2 and 3 remake style with bullet sponge zombies, cut content, generic OTS camera, and hand holding. This is the best resident evil game ever made and it will never be topped. OTS for Resident Evil is stale, RE8 will be first person, deal with it. I'm a real fan, you are fake since you want to destroy greatness. Capcom needs to focus on the future of this franchise, instead of ruining past greatness with soulless cashgrabs like RE2 and especially RE3 remake...

[Shocker]

Publicado originalmente por g.free.guy:

Disagree strongly. I want full 3D remakes of them all! I'm a fan since the original. 1996.
IMO, the RE2 and RE3 remakes are the way these stories should be told. The old school RE, that's only how it is because of tech limitations at the time. I don't like those limitations. I never did.
I overlooked them because it was a small price to pay for the content, and I understood why it had to be that way.. But you don't emulate them in a modern port of the game when you don't have to.
I like the RE1 HD Remaster, it's classic RE and then some. It's light years away from the RE2 Remake though.
It just is.An the RE3 Remake was even better. It's short, too short, I agree. And there's elements I wish it had, and elements I wish it didn't have.
Look what it offers in place though. It's incredible!
That's the new RE franchise. I say keep it coming! I'll pay for it all day long. And so will the rest of you. You'll deny it though.

I will never buy another remake you can count on that. I don't need them. RE2 remake better than RE1? LMAO absolutely not.

[V I D A L]

Shocker why do you seem to be mad of even the idea of it? A new remake of RE1 won't make this game disappear.

RE remake is my favourite Resident Evil. This still a masterpiece, aged very well and still looks great. Does it need a remake? No.. But I would still get more excited about an announcement of RE1 remake than the rumours about RE4 remake.

As much as I love this classic, I would love more RE1. This will always be the best in the series and being able to experience in a different way would be something exciting and there are plenty of things a remake could bring to the experience.

Exploring the mansion and these events in a full 3D environment would be great in the same way exploring the RPD on RE2 remake was. Nostalgic, yet new.

Having a playable intro- The same way RE2 remake started in the petrol station and RE3 remake started in Jill's apartment, I would expect a new RE1 remake to start in Racoon Forest and this time we would manually search the forest for Bravo team' chopper. Playing as Jill you would find Joseph being mauled by the dogs... playing as Chris you would hear the gun shots and go help Jill... then run to the mansion etc...

Having a canon ending. Funny enough, this RE1 has 10 endings, in which none of them are canon. The canon ending would be one in which you would be able to leave the mansion with Brad, Jill, Chris, Barry and Rebecca... They are the officially 5 survivors of the incident mentioned in later games, but playing this you can only either save Chris, Jill and Rebecca... or Jill, Chris and Barry.. never all 5.

I'd also like them to explore Crimson Heads and Lisa Trevor more.... giving them more presence. Lisa Trevor was pretty much the best new addition of this remake, but her ending was pretty underwhelming and silly. They could do more with that.

Lastly.. what if (not likely) but what if... they added a third campaign, after beating the game or as DLC, in which you play as Wesker. There was always this mystery of what was Wesker doing during the game and his quick encounters with Chris... A mini campaign as Wesker as you put his plans in motion and set the stage would be interesting to see. They played with the idea a bit in Umbrella Chronicles, but it could be explored in a new remake.

.. and at the end of the day, this version will still be here for us to revisit.

Like or not.. there are plenty of reasons to remake RE1 again.

[Shocker]

Publicado originalmente por V I D A L:

Shocker why do you seem to be mad of even the idea of it? A new remake of RE1 won't make this game disappear.

RE remake is my favourite Resident Evil. This still a masterpiece, aged very well and still looks great. Does it need a remake? No.. But I would still get more excited about an announcement of RE1 remake than the rumours about RE4 remake.

As much as I love this classic, I would love more RE1. This will always be the best in the series and being able to experience in a different way would be something exciting and there are plenty of things a remake could bring to the experience.

Exploring the mansion and these events in a full 3D environment would be great in the same way exploring the RPD on RE2 remake was. Nostalgic, yet new.

Having a playable intro- The same way RE2 remake started in the petrol station and RE3 remake started in Jill's apartment, I would expect a new RE1 remake to start in Racoon Forest and this time we would manually search the forest for Bravo team' chopper. Playing as Jill you would find Joseph being mauled by the dogs... playing as Chris you would hear the gun shots and go help Jill... then run to the mansion etc...

Having a canon ending. Funny enough, this RE1 has 10 endings, in which none of them are canon. The canon ending would be one in which you would be able to leave the mansion with Brad, Jill, Chris, Barry and Rebecca... They are the officially 5 survivors of the incident mentioned in later games, but playing this you can only either save Chris, Jill and Rebecca... or Jill, Chris and Barry.. never all 5.

I'd also like them to explore Crimson Heads and Lisa Trevor more.... giving them more presence. Lisa Trevor was pretty much the best new addition of this remake, but her ending was pretty underwhelming and silly. They could do more with that.

Lastly.. what if (not likely) but what if... they added a third campaign, after beating the game or as DLC, in which you play as Wesker. There was always this mystery of what was Wesker doing during the game and his quick encounters with Chris... A mini campaign as Wesker as you put his plans in motion and set the stage would be interesting to see. They played with the idea a bit in Umbrella Chronicles, but it could be explored in a new remake.

.. and at the end of the day, this version will still be here for us to revisit.

Like or not.. there are plenty of reasons to remake RE1 again.

Resident Evil 2 never had a canon ending either, especially the remake. Barry or Rebecca could either just escape from the forest and survive. The combination of both are the cannon. Why would you want another remake? Didn't we all wanted an RE2 remake all the time because of how good the RE1 remake was? Didn't we said that Capcom should do a fixed camera RE2 remake? Now people shifted a complete 180 since RE2 remake came out. Why do you need 3 remakes of a single game, instead of finally moving on? We are at a point where games that doesn't need a remake get's one... RE2 and 3 needed them cause they were outdated PS1 games, but the rest doesn't. Funny how other companies doesn't feel the need to remake games left and right, only Capcom. This franchise now became a remake fest with no original ideas, and that is sad. RE1 remake cannot be improved, and the apartment simulator part in RE3 was boring and uninteresting. RE2 and 3 remakes also didn't fleshed out any characters more than the originals, but RE1 remake did, there is nothing to improve here. They would probably cut out the giant snake, shark, and spiders too, cause the crappy RE engine can only handle realistic looking hamburgers but a spider that a 1996 game can handle is too much for the eye candy RE engine.

[V I D A L]

Well I disagree with pretty much everything you said. RE2 and 3 remake didn't flashed out the characters more than the originals? Not sure if you're being serious. Carlos didn't even exist in the original RE3 and now he is a pretty well developed character full of personality.

But hey... I have the feeling you didn't like RE7 either and that is Capcom moving on. These remakes are not stopping Capcom from progressing with the franchise. RE8 has been in development all this time.. they have multiple studios working on RE games. I speak for myself, but I can never have too many Re games and I rather remake/reimagining of the classics than spin offs such Revelations 1 and 2.

Besides.. your hate for the RE engine is just silly and juvenile. Feels like a waste of my time that I even tried to start a discussion about the positives a new RE1 remake could explore with someone who is just angry and stuck with negativity.

[Shocker]

Publicado originalmente por V I D A L:

Well I disagree with pretty much everything you said. RE2 and 3 remake didn't flashed out the characters more than the originals? Not sure if you're being serious. Carlos didn't even exist in the original RE3 and now he is a pretty well developed character full of personality.

But hey... I have the feeling you didn't like RE7 either and that is Capcom moving on. These remakes are not stopping Capcom from progressing with the franchise. RE8 has been in development all this time.. they have multiple studios working on RE games. I speak for myself, but I can never have too many Re games and I rather remake/reimagining of the classics than spin offs such Revelations 1 and 2.

Besides.. your hate for the RE engine is just silly and juvenile. Feels like a waste of my time that I even tried to start a discussion about the positives a new RE1 remake could explore with someone who is just angry and stuck with negativity.

Carlos had a lot of screen time in the original, so I don't know what are you talking about. Dario was less fleshed out in the remake, and the fate and screen time with Brad was also dissapointing. The only character that was an upgrade from the originals was Marvin. As for RE1, there is no reason to remake it again. There's nothing worthwhile to add and the game still holds up better than some of the newer ones. It was already been remade and it needs to be left alone. People like that game for what it is for a reason, it's atmospheric, challenging, and doesn't hold your hand unlike RE2 and RE3 remakes. It's one of Shinji Mikami's masterpiece that cannot be improved, same goes for RE4. By the way I like RE7 and the new direction that it took, and I'm glad that RE8 is following that formula. Peace.

[Shocker]

Publicado originalmente por TheHuskyGT:

My only problem with RE1Remake is the lack of higher resolutions and some backgrounds not even getting a facelift from the gamecube version. RE0 got the full remaster treatment, with most if not all backgrounds upscaled, resolutions up to 4K and unlimited frames. Don't see why Capcom half baked it with RE1.

It's not a gamebreaker, but I wish they made it a bit more consistent. As for a remake REMAKE, I don't think it needs it, but I I wouldn't complain if we got yet another way to play the classic.

I play on a 1080p monitor so it doesn't bothers me.

[EEddiii323]

Publicado originalmente por g.free.guy:

Disagree strongly. I want full 3D remakes of them all! I'm a fan since the original. 1996.
IMO, the RE2 and RE3 remakes are the way these stories should be told. The old school RE, that's only how it is because of tech limitations at the time. I don't like those limitations. I never did.
I overlooked them because it was a small price to pay for the content, and I understood why it had to be that way.. But you don't emulate them in a modern port of the game when you don't have to.
I like the RE1 HD Remaster, it's classic RE and then some. It's light years away from the RE2 Remake though.
It just is.An the RE3 Remake was even better. It's short, too short, I agree. And there's elements I wish it had, and elements I wish it didn't have.
Look what it offers in place though. It's incredible!
That's the new RE franchise. I say keep it coming! I'll pay for it all day long. And so will the rest of you. You'll deny it though.

fixed camera is what made resident evil great and unique, all OTS RE games failed to bring the same great atmosphere that the original games has . ..
fixed camera makes RE games scary and tense . it add so much to the atmosphere. it makes every step you take could result in a scary event or scary encounter with some monster . this style puts the player in stress all the time. OTS failed to bring that . and we've all seen how poorly the new remakes are in this regard.

tech limitations?? this is not true . they could've make RE games in 3d like tomb raider games but they realized that fixed camera style achieves the ideas better. like the dogs jumpscare for example . its so effective because of the camera style. it puts your eyes in somethings in the environment that you'll not notice in the OTS style or 1st person style like window for example , the camera tells you that this window might be broke at any moment. this will make you nervous when you passing by this window every time. OTS can't make something like this.

[BackdireinEis]

I would be already pleased, if they remade RE1 and just remove the fixed camera angles.

[Shocker]

Publicado originalmente por BackdireinEis:

I would be already pleased, if they remade RE1 and just remove the fixed camera angles.

Than you're a FAKE Resident Evil fan.

[BackdireinEis]

Publicado originalmente por Shocker:

Publicado originalmente por BackdireinEis:

I would be already pleased, if they remade RE1 and just remove the fixed camera angles.

Than you're a FAKE Resident Evil fan.

You don`t know, what you`re talking about.
I played ALL Resident Evil games, with the exception of Code Veronica.

And I believe, that one day Capcom will remake the 2 jewels RE1 + RE0. They can keep all the puzzles or make some of them in RE0 more logic.

And overall:
Nobody is forced to play a remake. Who would dislike it, can stay with this remake, we all have.

[Shocker]

Publicado originalmente por BackdireinEis:

Publicado originalmente por Shocker:

Than you're a FAKE Resident Evil fan.

You don`t know, what you`re talking about.
I played ALL Resident Evil games, with the exception of Code Veronica.

And I believe, that one day Capcom will remake the 2 jewels RE1 + RE0. They can keep all the puzzles or make some of them in RE0 more logic.

And overall:
Nobody is forced to play a remake. Who would dislike it, can stay with this remake, we all have.

I'm definitely not going to buy them.

[Glaston]

Publicado originalmente por EEddiii323:

Publicado originalmente por g.free.guy:

Disagree strongly. I want full 3D remakes of them all! I'm a fan since the original. 1996.
IMO, the RE2 and RE3 remakes are the way these stories should be told. The old school RE, that's only how it is because of tech limitations at the time. I don't like those limitations. I never did.
I overlooked them because it was a small price to pay for the content, and I understood why it had to be that way.. But you don't emulate them in a modern port of the game when you don't have to.
I like the RE1 HD Remaster, it's classic RE and then some. It's light years away from the RE2 Remake though.
It just is.An the RE3 Remake was even better. It's short, too short, I agree. And there's elements I wish it had, and elements I wish it didn't have.
Look what it offers in place though. It's incredible!
That's the new RE franchise. I say keep it coming! I'll pay for it all day long. And so will the rest of you. You'll deny it though.

fixed camera is what made resident evil great and unique, all OTS RE games failed to bring the same great atmosphere that the original games has . ..
fixed camera makes RE games scary and tense . it add so much to the atmosphere. it makes every step you take could result in a scary event or scary encounter with some monster . this style puts the player in stress all the time. OTS failed to bring that . and we've all seen how poorly the new remakes are in this regard.

tech limitations?? this is not true . they could've make RE games in 3d like tomb raider games but they realized that fixed camera style achieves the ideas better. like the dogs jumpscare for example . its so effective because of the camera style. it puts your eyes in somethings in the environment that you'll not notice in the OTS style or 1st person style like window for example , the camera tells you that this window might be broke at any moment. this will make you nervous when you passing by this window every time. OTS can't make something like this.

I've been playing the RE1 remake for the past couple weeks. I don't prefer that style.
I always thought that it was the story and the characters that made RE unique. Th overall package. Not just the camera.

I see every game as more of a simulation that allows you to exist in that world. That's why I play games. The jumpscares you're talking about, I guess I just don't put much value on that specific element. I can appreciate it and I did in the originals. I just always wanted more of a reality experience. Since the 1st time I played RE1 in 96, I loved it, but I wanted a more realistic experience in that environment. I looked at the prerendered backgrounds and fixed camera perspective as less than desireable but necessary because technology in the 90's couldn't offer that same graphic quality in a real time rendered full 3D game. But it surpasses it now. So I would enjoy it less if I was forced to have to deal with those same things in a modern remake.
It would've been incredibly dissapointing to me.