Why is DLC so expensive? And why don't you start developing Call to Arms

Guys I have same question. Let s make CtA alive again!

awesome dlc guys so much work on it keep it going, i literally wait for this for so long. Far away my fav RTS in the actual times

Originally posted by Sesheyger:

Why is DLC so expensive? And why don't you start developing Call to Arms

You’ve got to be joking. We’re basically getting a whole new game. The amount of brand new assets, maps, research, etc that went into this, $25 USD is a great price. When you think of it in total cost accounting terms, how much replay-ability is there? An enormous amount. Over the next 2 years, I’ll put in 800-1,000 hours. When you break it down into cost per use, it’s an incredible value.

Why aren’t they developing CtA? Completely different team. The only reason the CtA title is included is for legal reasons since they technically use that engine.

If you can’t see the value in this, it’s pretty evident you don’t know enough about the conflict, period and technical details to appreciate what’s been accomplished here. We have so few real WW2 games. This is one of the few communities in gaming where the history and the details are valued as much as the gameplay, and it’s glorious. It’s a fantastic game that’s only going to see improvement.

It’s amazing!!

Originally posted by Sesheyger:

Why is DLC so expensive? And why don't you start developing Call to Arms

What is funny is that this is a DLC to a DLC Cause "Gates of Hell" is listed as DLC to "CTA" and this is a DLC to "Gates of Hell"

Originally posted by Sesheyger:

Originally posted by Weiter:

You’ve got to be joking. We’re basically getting a whole new game. The amount of brand new assets, maps, research, etc that went into this, $25 USD is a great price. When you think of it in total cost accounting terms, how much replay-ability is there? An enormous amount. Over the next 2 years, I’ll put in 800-1,000 hours. When you break it down into cost per use, it’s an incredible value.

Why aren’t they developing CtA? Completely different team. The only reason the CtA title is included is for legal reasons since they technically use that engine.

If you can’t see the value in this, it’s pretty evident you don’t know enough about the conflict, period and technical details to appreciate what’s been accomplished here. We have so few real WW2 games. This is one of the few communities in gaming where the history and the details are valued as much as the gameplay, and it’s glorious. It’s a fantastic game that’s only going to see improvement.

It’s amazing!!

This is all wonderful, of course, although I regret spending money on Call to Arms about modern warfare. But as far as I know, a new Men of War II will be released in 2024:morphine:

I see. Ok, well I suppose it may be an opinion based thing on my part, but when I’ve played games like CoH and MoW, there are so many major historical inaccuracies. I can always tolerate a few small ones, but they have them habitually, throughout. If MoW were to fix that, hire consultants and out the historical context and research in GoH does, I’d welcome the competition in the genre. With CoH having a strange cartoon/comic aesthetic to it, and MoW having the issues mentioned, GoH appears to stand alone in genre that seems all it’s own.

Нет что бы развивать сетинг современной войны, опять это блядство с второй мировой

Originally posted by L1qu1dator:

What is funny is that this is a DLC to a DLC :CoconutLaugh: Cause "Gates of Hell" is listed as DLC to "CTA" and this is a DLC to "Gates of Hell"

I'm personally nonplused that its clear the devs are now going to make a paid DLC British faction and a paid DLC Japanese faction to follow using this same pricing structure (and whatever else the devs can imagine to milk as a faction DLC, what's next Viche France? Etc.)

The models brought over into the new GoH engine look 'passable' sure don't get me wrong but it's basically just an update of MoW:AS2 with an inflated price tag and that's a steep value assessment given the already scaled-back unit variety in GoH so far (Not counting 'unique' assets that only show up in 1 campaign mission, I mean like in competitive multiplayer & conquest & skirmish) so might grab it if it's 10 dollars on the winter sale otherwise I'm personally done supporting the direction the devs are taking this in bad faith of their original purchasers.

Originally posted by Weiter:

If MoW were to fix that, hire consultants and out the historical context and research in GoH does, I’d welcome the competition in the genre. With CoH having a strange cartoon/comic aesthetic to it, and MoW having the issues mentioned, GoH appears to stand alone in genre that seems all it’s own.

😂imagine thinking GoH is the pinnacle of historical accuracy...
Sure you do you. I don't even care about the historical argument one way or the other - My criticism is that it's just a pretty crap deal buddy.

DLC for a DLC, greedy

greedy and ww2 is boring its been done to death

Originally posted by Videogames:

Originally posted by L1qu1dator:

What is funny is that this is a DLC to a DLC Cause "Gates of Hell" is listed as DLC to "CTA" and this is a DLC to "Gates of Hell"

I'm personally nonplused that its clear the devs are now going to make a paid DLC British faction and a paid DLC Japanese faction to follow using this same pricing structure (and whatever else the devs can imagine to milk as a faction DLC, what's next Viche France? Etc.)

Oooh I can't wait for a Hindu faction paid DLC...

Greed

Originally posted by Mahero:

Нет что бы развивать сетинг современной войны, опять это блядство с второй мировой

Напомни, пожалуйста, о чём конкретно эта игра ? О второй мировой. Значит и контент по ней выходит о второй мировой.

My grandfather fought for liberation and although they did not win the war I will always have him in my memory.

Do any of these have a Tutorial?