How do you destroy m1a2 abrams

[Burrito Mussolini]

The T-80U and BV are not very effective. And the RPG-29 does not seem to do any damage.

[The Old Relic]

2 ways I have taken it out is by lobbing Molotov cocktails on the engine bay or hitting the rear with AT. Both require some stealth by your units but can be done. If I am not in position I will take out a track making it immobile until I can assess the situation.

[PvtNewb]

Flank them and shoot the ammo bustle (rear compartment of the turret) or shoot on the dead center if you are flanking him from the sides. Sometimes I got lucky by shooting the turret ring lol.

[allennguyen93]

Originally posted by QUANTUM MECHANICS c000021a:

Originally posted by Argo141:

ammo bustle, turret ring

Unfortunately, none of the things you mentioned are present in game. You better don`t want to know what vehicle damage system CtA has. To be honest even CoH has more sophisticated damage system.

in the feature vote, they implied that they are working on new damage system for vehicles.

[Burrito Mussolini]

I would like a new damage system. The BTR-80's and M-ATVs etc should have more armor. I would like a damage system thats more realistic and not so punishing with vehicles unless hit directly at the hull or something.

[Burrito Mussolini]

So then what will solve everything?

[allennguyen93]

Originally posted by QUANTUM MECHANICS c000021a:

About time. But if they have a smallest intention to silently rework this stupid rng system to act like new one they better leave it like this because it can`t be worse. Or as many times said before they should make hardcore mode as default setting. (To balance infantry and vehicle system to be fully coherent and fair)
Pardon me but some words must be said more times to make them fully understandable for wide community and perhaps even for developers.

Because this franchise has only bad and worse vehicle damage and repair mechanisms with single exception of SHWW2.

Thank you for understanding.

i don't know about you but gunfight without hardecore mode on is much more enjoyable and balanced. The hardcore mode magnifies the imbalance between fps and rts aspects of the game. As of the state of the balance with hardmode right now, M4 rifles +hardcore mode+ FPS = massacre against grm.

[clfiskus]

if u dont realize, abrams frontal is weaker then t80s front armor( inreal life definately not the case)
Abrams cant pen t80s front and t80 can easily pen abrams front providing that the hull isnt angled much.So t80 is better then abrams in this game although abrams still has a little better gun and side and turret armor.Simply put in a head to head t80 can kill abrams while abrams can only pen t80s turret side rear.

[clfiskus]

I thinks us shud be given tank superiorty( yes there wouldnt be balance there) and grm tanks could be much less costly mp and cp,or instead give grm more strenth in other areas

[CSKA'Nikolai]

Originally posted by clfiskus:

I thinks us shud be given tank superiorty( yes there wouldnt be balance there) and grm tanks could be much less costly mp and cp,or instead give grm more strenth in other areas

T80U is a good tank no doubt, but honestly I think the US should get the more newer versions of the M1A2, Like Sep V2 or Sep V3. GRM at the moment for me is much easier to use and more chance of winning due to the cost and effectiveness of their equipment. How they would balance out GRM is the Question, maybe give the GRM T-72BM with Kontakt-1 ERA.

[WEHRMACHT_DOGGO]

Hit on the lower plate of the hull

[clfiskus]

if you know when you have abrams to go for t80s turret ,then its no problem