Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You have an anime profile picture.
Hopefully it is as optimized as Doom Eternal
Fully RT pipelines at least where lighting is concerned means no baked lighting workflow bottlenecks for devs, and all their tech stacks are going to have these resources in mind going forward. It makes sense for them to exploit that, and it's overdue frankly.
The actual requirements aren't that intensive in terms of raw performance either, if you really look at it. The 2060 Super, RT aside, is about 15% faster than a 1070 Ti, and is six years old at this point.
Zen 2 is three microarchitecture generations old, and has way less IPC than more recent Zens and was limited to DDR4. In that context, along with the fact that the game is going to be on Xbox Series S, I actually think these specs suggest it will scale surprisingly well both up and down. But we need benchmarks to be sure.
The specs are reasonable for what the game appears to be doing, though.
So do I. If you save for 6-8 years on a good salary without buying any other modern games, you could probably afford to start purchasing the individual components for a gaming pc that could run Doom DA at recommended settings.
Supporting a 5 years old card which is also in the low end segment and that is cheaper than the game itself is not optimization. It's necromancy. Stop being ridiculous.
Doom has never supported such a low end hardware. Not even in the nineties.
In my case, the only thing I can hope for is that 8GB VRAM isn't a hard cap. My gpu has only 6GB VRAM, but my CPU, SSD and regular RAM all meet the requirements.
Yes, I acknowledge this is a me problem, but I cannot justify to myself buying a new (expensive) GPU just to meet the minimum requirements of just one game. It would be different if I had other demanding titles in my library that also require that amount of VRAM, but I don't. So I guess I'm out.
Although, I think it should be possible to play this game with less than 8GB VRAM if they allow people to at least boot the game with GPUs that don't meet the requirments for 1080p but who are willing to play it on lower resolutions like 720p (which is far from great, but what should not require 8GB VRAM or more).