j'ai un PC qui tiens normalement entièrement le jeu, je sais que ce jeu est assez ancien. Néanmoins je trouve intolérable que steam vend des jeux qui ne sont pas fonctionnel sur des ordinateurs actuelles. SVP vérifé que vos jeux sont toujours valide et commercialisable.
Je ne fais pas ce rapport pour montrer ma colère (je n'ai payer ce jeu que 1,69€), mais pour prévenir si d'autre personne achète le jeu

Pour faire tourner le jeu installez dgVoodoo 2, ça émule une carte 3DFX et permet de faire fonctionner les vieilles bibliothèques graphiques sur les PC modernes. Installez aussi le High resolution fix pour gérer les hautes résolutions et les ratios autre que 4:3. Allez sur le PCGamingWiki pour les détails. Même avec ça le jeu peut occasionnellement crash donc sauvegardez régulièrement.
Blood II: The Chosen est la suite de Blood qui prend place environ 100 ans plus tard. Alors que le premier jeu est un classique du FPS ce second épisode est un jeu raté qui a tué sa licence. Ça manque cruellement de finition sur plein d'aspects et l'expérience de jeu n'est pas agréable.

• Énormément d'armes. On peut en porter 10 sur soi et il faudra faire des choix en lâchant des armes. Certaines armes peuvent être utilisées dans chaque main si on en trouve plusieurs. Il y a pas mal de variété même si certaines armes font doublons.
• Gameplay dynamique.

• Les dégâts aléatoires de nos armes. Parfois on tue un ennemi en 1 coup de fusil à pompe parfois il en faudra 4 ou 5 pour ce même ennemi à la même distance.
• Le temps de réaction inexistant des ennemis. On rentre dans une pièce et quand on a repéré un ennemi armé il nous déjà touché. La plupart des ennemis ont des armes « hit scan » c'est-à-dire sans projectile physique et donc inesquivables si on n'est pas à couvert.
• Le choix de personnage. On a le choix entre 4 personnages mais quel intérêt ?! Ça change l'arme de départ et les stats de vie, magie… Pourquoi prendre un personnage typé magie alors que les armes magiques n'arrivent que tardivement dans l'aventure ?! À noter que seul Caleb a droit aux cinématiques ! Bref plusieurs personnages ont été implémentés mais mal vu le jeu n'a pas bien été fini. Jouez Caleb.
• La mise en scène dans les cinématiques. Rarement vu un tel non-sens.
• La répétitivité des environnement et des séquences de jeu.
• Manque de finition global.
Si vous voulez quand même tester le jeu, essayez le mod Extra Crispy ça améliore le jeu sur pas mal de points.

Well, I played this game, as I was young and I loved it.
It gave me scary nights and fear moments. I still own the original CD but I never could make it run proper on Win 7.
So I´m real happy that you can buy it now from steam and it run good on win 7 but only in 1024 x 768 like that.
Highly recommended. To bad that is not remastered in HD.

Update : I play the game now with the "extra grisby mod" and this is a lot of improvement in sound, graphic & bug fixes just check this out.
http://www.moddb.com/mods/blood-2-the-chosen-extra-crispy

First of all, when Blood2 was released in 1998, it was one of my favorite shooter right away. It had a good gunplay, varied weapons and enemies, as well as a good level design. Overall, I had a lot of fun with it.

So why the negative rating?
Because the game is almost unplayable on a current PC with a current operating system. I tried every guide, but in the end the game always remained very unstable and crashes on average every 5 minutes.
Without a lot of mods / patches the game is not playable at all.

It is time for Steam to introduce a quality control to prevent games being offered at Steam that can not be played on current computers. Please Steam, do something against it!

Initially, I thought that Blood 2 was just an unfortunate sequel that came out sometime in 2000's and was lazily made by a different studio – a story similar to Deus Ex and its Invisible War sequel. However, when I saw the actual release date and googled the whole story behind the game's development, I felt really bad for the developers and even didn't want to critisize Blood 2 harshly. Nevertheless, the problem is that at the end of the day those tragic events do not improve the quality of the final product from the player's point of view.

For those who don’t know, in short, the publisher of Blood was close to bankruptcy and they demanded Monolith Productions to make a sequel "here and now". And you already can guess the rest: the game quality turned out to be very mediocre and GT Interactive was bought by Atari anyway. Now I could start writing a long review with detailed analysis of every game's aspect, however, I won't do it. Not only because I personally feel bad for the developers but because just the idea of making a full-fledged 3D game with sufficient plot and unique features in 11 months back in 1997 sounds ridiculous enough by itself. From that point of view, I'm surprised that Blood 2 came out as a playable-ish product and not just a laggy-buggy piece of code. However, as I've already stated, the development story doesn't justify the game's quality for the consumer, so I will just give you a list of problems the game has. Let's go!

Mostly cramped linear levels
Instant-reacting hitscan enemies
Weird animations
Totally unbalanced difficulties
Odd drops from destroying objects
Censored swearing
OP facejumpers in the water
Clumsy transition between levels
Flare gun looks like shotgun
Repetitive voice lines from enemies
Voodoo doll happy particles
Stupid AI
Weird hitboxes
No sniper aiming animation
Knife has a bullet-hitting sound
Locked and decorative doors look the same
No convenient way to bind weapons
Enemy damage goes through walls
Mouse wheel does not work
The game crashes regularly
Explosive weapons have insanely low damage
Idiotic damage RNG
Character speed breaks in the nightmares add-on
Initially, it seems fine but the father you go the more miserable it becomes

And I could easily finish my review at this point, but the game actually had decent ideas, like 4 playable characters, semi-open world and detailed plot. Some of them even made it to the final game: there are about 20 weapons you can find and use, magic weapons have regenerating ammo, Life Leech heals you, each character has different stats and plays a bit differently. However, those few good ideas just drown in the sea of bugs, poor level design, unbalanced AI, etc.

Should you play this game? Well, if you liked the first title and just want to know what Blood 2 is – maybe. If you are looking for a good retro shooter – no. If you like to explore unfinished and quirky games – probably. My only recommendation will be to play it on the lowest difficulty – genocide. Do not waste your nerves and time with the higher ones, it isn't worth it at all.

If Blood II's screen flickers between the game and an empty window during gameplay, here are a couple of things to try:

1. Turn off any programs in the System Tray with animated icons (e.g. Process Explorer, Speedfan).

2. In the Blood II Launcher, go to Advanced Options, type "+maxfps 60" (without quotes) into the Command-Line field, and check "Always specify these command-line parameters"

♥♥♥♥♥♥' RAW

Oh boy! I can't wait to play the sequel to my favorite classic shooter, Blood! I hope it's finished, polished, and good!

Oh


Oh no

⣿⣯⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣤⣤⣀
⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷
　　⠈⠻⣿⡛⠉⠭⠉⠉⢉⣿⣿⣧
⠲⣶⠖⠄⠄⢿⣿⠄⠶⣶⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧
　　　⠺⢿⡗⠄⣹⣿⣿⠿⣟⣿⡏
　　　　⠤⠤⢾⣿⣿⣿⣦⠘⡿
　　⠈⢻⡿⣷⣶⣶⣤⣤⣤⣶⣦
　　　⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟
　　　⠘⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿

http://www.moddb.com/mods/blood-2-the-chosen-extra-crispy

It helps

It ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ raw
4/10