Leap Year

Leap Year

View Stats:
About this new added March Dlc
I played through the game and eventually completed it, but the final gauntlet of puzzles for 29th date was so annoying and dumb for me, overall the game before that point was very short and...kinda mid? It says new Dlc adds more content and a little bit harder, so i kinda have a question for those who already completed it - is it worth it? Did you had the same experience in both, or Dlc was better for you somehow? :kittykitty:
Originally posted by Hollow Void:
DLC is much harder and convoluted compared to the original game. the gauntlet for 29 in the original game is roughly the same length as the gauntlet for 31 in March, however the DLC has you weaving between rooms in double backing a lot more than the original game.

The DLC is also much longer. It isn't too difficult to beat the original game in less than 15 minutes within a few tries after beating the game, however the DLC is approximately 3x as large and requires much more brainpower to find an ideal route to follow.

imo the DLC was much better because I enjoyed the difficulty. From your post you described the original game as annoying and dumb, so I am unsure if you found it difficult but maybe just tedious. The DLC is more tedious than the original, so you may have a worse time playing it. It is only a few bucks however, and the catharsis of reaching the end after a very difficult and long challenge is worth it.
< >
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
The author of this thread has indicated that this post answers the original topic.
DLC is much harder and convoluted compared to the original game. the gauntlet for 29 in the original game is roughly the same length as the gauntlet for 31 in March, however the DLC has you weaving between rooms in double backing a lot more than the original game.

The DLC is also much longer. It isn't too difficult to beat the original game in less than 15 minutes within a few tries after beating the game, however the DLC is approximately 3x as large and requires much more brainpower to find an ideal route to follow.

imo the DLC was much better because I enjoyed the difficulty. From your post you described the original game as annoying and dumb, so I am unsure if you found it difficult but maybe just tedious. The DLC is more tedious than the original, so you may have a worse time playing it. It is only a few bucks however, and the catharsis of reaching the end after a very difficult and long challenge is worth it.
Originally posted by Hollow Void:
DLC is much harder and convoluted compared to the original game. the gauntlet for 29 in the original game is roughly the same length as the gauntlet for 31 in March, however the DLC has you weaving between rooms in double backing a lot more than the original game.

The DLC is also much longer. It isn't too difficult to beat the original game in less than 15 minutes within a few tries after beating the game, however the DLC is approximately 3x as large and requires much more brainpower to find an ideal route to follow.

imo the DLC was much better because I enjoyed the difficulty. From your post you described the original game as annoying and dumb, so I am unsure if you found it difficult but maybe just tedious. The DLC is more tedious than the original, so you may have a worse time playing it. It is only a few bucks however, and the catharsis of reaching the end after a very difficult and long challenge is worth it.
I described that part (the Final gauntlet) specifically like this because when i missed some dates it was due to my own lack of exploration and usage of game mechanics (like dates 20-21 and 23), but for this part i genually had no idea what the game wanted from me, because there wasn't any hint or example like that before. After these two speedruns i'm okay with this part now, but i was curious if there is anything extraordinary like this again in Dlc. Thanks for your answer, i'll try it out someday! :happymeat:
< >
Showing 1-2 of 2 comments
Per page: 1530 50