Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The Empire is huge compared to Gallia and militistic/authoritarian, they can afford to pick an all male enlisted force that a democracy cannot.
To be fair, there are many reasons why you do not want women on the front lines, mostly due to the potential discipline problems and affairs that can happen with people being flushed with adrenaline and working together for long term. For example, the USS Acardia.
As for the 'female fan service', I do admit it is nice but the whole concept of Valkyries presupposes a female avatar. What would a male Valkyrie be other than a norse berserker?
Ug... off track. Yes the Empire is sexist. The Gallian military is too but they're too desperate to be picky.
The Gallian Regular Army is the same, in fact I only recall Audrey Gassenarl and Margit from VC3 but there are probably a few others, they're just very rare cases. It's the Gallian Militia which just grabs anyone who can fight from regular civilians so they have a more colorful soldier stock.
A similar thing happens with darcsens. Neither the Empire nor the Gallian Army wants them in their troops, but if they have to fight, they can do so in the militia.
If one wears a proper suit of armor, you shouldn't be able to tell what gender they are because good armor doesn't take on a "female" appearance. Same with modern BDUs (battle dress uniforms); one's flesh tends to stick out more than fabric since it reflects light more and typically clashes with camouflage patterns, so the skirts that Alicia and Rosie wear are ridiculously impractical. Really, the only way one should be able to discern a soldier's gender is through the soldier's explicit discretion (a face/hair alone is not always a reliable indicator).
Also, you do hear female voices all the time over the radio chatter. The chatter in Behind Her Blue Flame on the Empire's side, while it is of a stern woman, doesn't necessarily sound like Selvaria (could be wrong, though; radio DOES distort voices). And of course Gallia has female radio chatter that isn't just Varrot. So there seems to be plenty of female officers who maintain operational command over various fields of combat. It is entirely possible they skipped gruntwork entirely, as in the real world you can go to an officers academy to train as a junior officer (lieutenant/cadet) with little actual combat experience.
And to that end, I was mostly referring to the outfits worn by Isara, Alicia, and Rosie. And I was thinking of the Imperial uniforms in terms of "BDUs where you can't tell the gender apart".
Kind of true. Seen in this light, it's the Galieans that are 'sexist'. IMO, unless you're Scottish, miniskirts have no place on the battlefield, and they need it for their big balls.
On a related but more humorous note, *cough...general issue blue underwear...cough*
You know what men are going to do if they ever caught a female alive who shot and killed their friends. Raped to death is the most likely outcome.
Galia is a small nation where everyone has to fight for its indipendince, the Federation is fighting tooth and nail and will likely accept female recruits, probably wont be conscripting any, i would say the same for the empire, largly because in the other VC games. You see a series of other female officers in the Imperial army. Now if it was sexist, would any man accept the orders of a female? i mean you gotta think about it, if it was sexist then soldiers wouldnt listen to Salvaria, even IF she had permission given to her by Maximilian. Also keep in mind that the Empire was based on the USSR and Nazi germany. Men sentric orgonizations, but in the USSR's case they had MANY female units, mainly pilots and tankers. Now the Nazi's actually never let women fight in the war, even the Volksturm (the last ditch CONSCRIPT EVERYONE plan the nazi party had in early 1945) didnt have women in it. So again, its likely that women ARE in the Imperial Army, just not as much as in the Galian army/militia and Federation. heck they may not let them be infantry sense females are usually physcally weaker then men, USUALLY trust me I know a few women who would easily kick my ass and look at any female member of the USMC, they are scary... but i digress.
TL:DR
I dont think its Sexist, it likely has many female axuileries, pilots, tankers, administrators, assistants, field hospital workers, ect... but doesnt conscript the fairer sex like Galia does.
That said, the setting sort of mirrors WW2, right? In WW2, the only side that really made much use of women was the Soviet Union, and only reluctantly and because they were absolutely desperate (and even then only as snipers, pilots, etc.) After the war, the Soviets discharged all women from service apart from a handful who'd go on to tour the US as sort of good will ambassadors. Women were (and are) still very much living in a sexist society in Russia despite being able to fight Nazis alongside the men, however.
Also, as others have mentioned, Galia certainly isn't advancing women by forcing them to wear sexy skirts and long stockings on the battlefield instead of pants like the men. This definitely is not a game that's trying to make a social statement. The devs probably a) couldn't be bothered to make female Empire models and b) want some sexy-ass babes to look at on the player side.