worth is subjective, it can set a certain number. Your problem is "fearing" or "attacking" the concept that people only wanting to pay (or not paying at all for some people) the below the minimum cost of
" for the buyer? Like, certainly I don't buy a product out of charity, not this at least. I got to speak for myself as a consumer, right?!

Bottom line. If you can't understand the concept that value

would be nice, I guess.

But, you said the decision seemed "arbitrary" and, if the history of gaming has anything to say about it, it's not.

I'm a retired gamer. I've played a metric crapton of games
activated, with the exception of one that I'll get to in a sec, they were always terribly problematic.

What they do is set the player on a course where they get so enthralled with planning that they end up

middle of the base area. That's not terribly difficult, but it does mean that if you have a colonist you've Drafted and told to move to the "Safe Room" you've set up, they shouldn't move into line-of
- They will always leave you in possession of your territory. That means that your objective is not to hold ground, but to preserve lives.

That Dining Room should be written off as soon as the Drop Pods

Автор сообщения: WabbaCat

I have already pointed some of the instances out that you pull with me when it comes to twisting what others say. Generally I pointed them out already in the
the punctuation. If nothing else, that should have given you pause on what you were trying to claim I was saying.
If this was not the case, you would not have said it.
And wtf? Isn't that a bit ass of

stockpile up to a decent level of Meals." Adjust as necessary. When you only need one Cook to keep up with demand and still have a nice stockpile of Meals, do not dismantle that other Cooker. Leave it
in Cooking than Warden AND your stockpile of Meals gets far below your set inventory levels, guess what? :) Wardening isn't going to get done, is it? But, since Warden may take a little time out of the

can assign a certain set of animals to the pen and handlers will bring the correct animals over. Pen markers have an “auto cut” option which will periodically designate inedible plants in the pen to be
terrain fertility in an easy-to-see way.
Added terrain affordance overlay, which shows where you can build what in an easy-to-see way.
Added barricades, which are like sandbags, but can be constructed of

like to prioritise first and foremost before anything. Taming is but one of many; this is not exclusively about taming. I do not need more handlers if I am willing to sacrifice certain tasks. Do I really
need to milk the cows when I have hundreds of milk already laying in the field? Does the Megasloth really need to shed fur when 15,000 units are in storage? Think on it.[/quote]

There's really not

point in making silver and other precious material walls anyways - but tell me if you are using them to build walls fora practical funcion and not because of extreme survival strategies.)
In this way, I
masses and meat ammount - especially animals, since you should never be able to get the exact same mass of meat out of an animal as it's actual mass wild animal's meat ammout is calculated as being doubble

literally had 3 growers all making an area bigger than 70x70 grown, and set to grow 1 and I had the rest of my colonists at cook 1, I then figured out that, uhm, I had a tiiiiny bit more food than I needed
1) What are the colonists that randomly ask to join you for a temporary amount of time?
- They offer to join your colony permanently, not temporarily. Of course, if you don't want them, you

) Try to reduce distance walked to all objectives as much as possible. For example, put beds right NEXT to the bedroom door. For reference I am running an A16 game right now, with 3x4 rooms, and no one is
Some good suggestions above, Joel especially. I will add my own. I'm hugely off your original topic, sorry.
Here'smy current A16 base. I do use lots of mods, but I'll keep suggestions to vanilla game