their knowledge to overcome a "Raid" is not an Exploit. It's an intended effect of purposeful design - The player uses their knowledge of the game's mechanics to overcome an obstacle and to obtain a goal
... Well, that's more of a character flaw than commonly found than innocent human fallibility.

To sum - It's not an exploit at all. It's just a commonly used strategy that has been arrived at by players

, but I think the game is deleting things that it thinks are unnecessary (ie, pawns or objects that it thinks you will not possibly interact with), then later finding references to those items
Wow, that is one hell of an error log!
I'm not an expert on the interior workings of Rimworld's engine, but I've had enough problems with enough games over the years that I have a pretty good idea of

Postat inițial de Astasia:

...Not to make any argument or statement, just as an objective fact and point of reference so somebody isn't confused by the results or expects something specific
trying to mimic any real drug or be an accurate representation, it just uses them as inspiration for the sci-fi drugs invented in the game. This is not any sort of legal or moral statement.

I'm

of travel between these point of interests / dungeons / objectives / towns to not only prevent making the world layer and traveling system irrelevant - but to promote exploration in each level, as food
frustrate the player and be generous often

-Fog of War during battle maps

-Auto resting is disabled, you have to decide when to set up camp, be in a dungeon or on the road, or in a settlement at an inn, and

about attacking a settlement, not a ruin.

Now, hear me out, I know this is going to blow your mind, but...

Maybe the royal fortress of an interstellar empire's top noble should have more defenses than
weapons so you can pick them off while they have a 1% chance to hit you even without intervening objects...

Then, once we've made settlements have meaningful defenses, we can make them have things of value

able to easily identify the XML references that separate each recipe from the others. There's all kinds of things you can define about a Rimworld object in XML. You can simply copy an existing recipe and
Recipes are just simple xml files. Turning a recipe into an actual mod requires only a little work, but you can safely work out the details of your recipe fairly easily.

I'm not at my RW PC right

my "opinion."

Reference for an easily digestible review of US Copyright Law, which would apply in this case due to Steam/Valve EULA/TOS
contact your lawyer not complain on a message board.

If its the second you need to look at steam and rimworld terms of conditions. Because I believe that because there is no money involved you are giving

items, materials, moving objects (animals) to a server and send it to a client. LA A A AAA AAA AG.
IK what im talking, im a PZ player, around 1k hours on MP. 99% of my deaths was becouse of lag
referred to I'm bringing the topic back around to the point of the thread. If I am replying that way it's because we have gotten off topic yet again on why I feel that adding multiplayer and achievements

original work to a desired medium.

If I made a 3D figure of Mickey Mouse and sold it on TurboSquid, would Disney not have recourse simply because I chose that medium? What about converting one object format
to another by hand and undertaking significant effort to ensure a good conversion? It represents a very significant effort and alteration of, let's say, a set of 2D "reference images" in order to

's unusual. While the wavefront object file format is still excellent and very broadly, nearly universally supported due to its simplicity, it's not usually used as the base file-type in video games. It has
some limitations that are easier and/or more efficient to overcome with other file formats, which can help offset file-size/load differences. (I don't know what sort of renderer it was using.)

An