Biological age is higher than chronological age

[Nordil(Hun)]

I think this is a minor bug, as chronological age should be at least => than biological age.
I just met a character whose chronological age is 17 years 3 quadrums and 11 days whereas her biological age is 18 years 0 quadrums and 2 days.

If I understood correctly what chronological age stands for, then there seems to be a flaw with the check for these ages.

[whatamidoing]

With default settings, pawns under 18 biologically age faster.

[Vintorez]

For the sake of gameplay children and young teens age faster than normal, resulting in higher biological ages for pawns that were born mid-game or generated young enough.

[Garatgh Deloi]

Originally posted by Nordil(Hun):

I think this is a minor bug, as chronological age should be at least => than biological age.
I just met a character whose chronological age is 17 years 3 quadrums and 11 days whereas her biological age is 18 years 0 quadrums and 2 days.

If I understood correctly what chronological age stands for, then there seems to be a flaw with the check for these ages.

1. For simple mechanical gameplay reasons children age much quicker then they should (So that it does not take 18 ingame years for a child to become a fully functional adult pawn).

2. Then we also have technology in the Rimworld universe like growth vats that age you biologically at a accelerated rate (2000% or even 2600% with the precept).

[x]

I rejuvenate my people with surgery.

[HunterSilver]

Originally posted by Nordil(Hun):

I think this is a minor bug, as chronological age should be at least => than biological age.
I just met a character whose chronological age is 17 years 3 quadrums and 11 days whereas her biological age is 18 years 0 quadrums and 2 days.

If I understood correctly what chronological age stands for, then there seems to be a flaw with the check for these ages.

This is a special character and their age is meant to be like this. They're unknown for a reason and their abilities are equally crazy to match.

[Khan Boyzitbig of Mercia]

Originally posted by HunterSilver:

Originally posted by Nordil(Hun):

I think this is a minor bug, as chronological age should be at least => than biological age.
I just met a character whose chronological age is 17 years 3 quadrums and 11 days whereas her biological age is 18 years 0 quadrums and 2 days.

If I understood correctly what chronological age stands for, then there seems to be a flaw with the check for these ages.

This is a special character and their age is meant to be like this. They're unknown for a reason and their abilities are equally crazy to match.

Except that it could be any pawn who was spawned under the age of 18, unless the background/s they have are unknown they are normal pawns.

[Steelfleece]

Originally posted by Nordil(Hun):

I think this is a minor bug, as chronological age should be at least => than biological age.
I just met a character whose chronological age is 17 years 3 quadrums and 11 days whereas her biological age is 18 years 0 quadrums and 2 days.

The bug is only a minor chronologically, biologically they're legal.