Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Firstly UserBenchmark is not that accurate to begin with.
Secondly the chip is not even released so there are relatively little benchmarks.
Thirdly the i9 is a workstation CPU its not meant to game on, and sacrifices frequency for high core counts. The i9 has 18 cores compared to the i7s 6 cores, and thus will have a massive advantage in multi threaded workloads.
Since this game is single threaded, even a i3 would have a similar performance to an older i7
Also: If you use userbenchmark to compare a i3 to a i7 the "effective" difference is only 17%. Which is obviously not true. The i7 crushes the i3 in most workloads.
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-8700K-vs-Intel-Core-i3-9100F/3937vs4054