incest? why?

[happyscrub]

nt

[Xariot]

引用自 Ensign：

Id like an argument to this....
If what you say in that peice i quoted you in is true, that there is a true morality and changes in what society sees are irrelevant, then how do you explain the true morality of not being able to say "underwear" in the victorian era?
Or how in the 1920s american women dancing fast, drinking freely and wearing outrageous loose outfits were morally corrupt? Those things were outrageously immoral but we got over that. Does this not prove there is no true morality?

All that proves is that society's views on morality change which is exactly what I said. But what you're talking about is accepting when one or more people says "This is bad; This is good," when they don't actually have the right to make that decision. True morality is what is actually good and bad.

You can choose for yourself how to act and what to think, but you can't change the truth of what is good and what is bad. You can convince yourself and you can let others convince you, but the true morality doesn't change based on that.

引用自 Ensign：

It sounds wrong though. The changing state of moral values does change the truth. There is no true morality so its not free will that makes us blind to it as it doesnt exist.

The changing state of societal moral values changes the truth of what the current state of societal moral values are. It doesn't change true morality.

Free will doesn't blind. Free will gives the ability to choose how we act and what we think. If you are "blind" to true morality, you're blinded by philosophy of men, and by the god that rules the world, who has tried to convice from the beginning just as you even said "There is no true morality," that we can decide for ourselves what is good and bad.

[RayvenQ]

From a Gameplay point of view, although these are just assumptions on my part, I can see it being changed to what it was for the following reasons.

Humans: Possibly changed so that inlaws could get it on.

Animals: Possibly changed because fi you had a lot of animals fathered by the same animal, and lots of interbred and interrelated animals, if one dies, or if the parent of them all dies, they could get a debuff which could make them snap and go wild, and if all your animals are related to the one that died, it could be a cause of wiping out colonies in a manner thats too hard to avoid.

[Jinx]

Free sex for everyone yaaaay :3

[Eretnek]

引用自 Xariot：

引用自 Ensign：

Id like an argument to this....
If what you say in that peice i quoted you in is true, that there is a true morality and changes in what society sees are irrelevant, then how do you explain the true morality of not being able to say "underwear" in the victorian era?
Or how in the 1920s american women dancing fast, drinking freely and wearing outrageous loose outfits were morally corrupt? Those things were outrageously immoral but we got over that. Does this not prove there is no true morality?

All that proves is that society's views on morality change which is exactly what I said. But what you're talking about is accepting when one or more people says "This is bad; This is good," when they don't actually have the right to make that decision. True morality is what is actually good and bad.

You can choose for yourself how to act and what to think, but you can't change the truth of what is good and what is bad. You can convince yourself and you can let others convince you, but the true morality doesn't change based on that.

引用自 Ensign：

It sounds wrong though. The changing state of moral values does change the truth. There is no true morality so its not free will that makes us blind to it as it doesnt exist.

The changing state of societal moral values changes the truth of what the current state of societal moral values are. It doesn't change true morality.

Free will doesn't blind. Free will gives the ability to choose how we act and what we think. If you are "blind" to true morality, you're blinded by philosophy of men, and by the god that rules the world, who has tried to convice from the beginning just as you even said "There is no true morality," that we can decide for ourselves what is good and bad.

there is no free will you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idiot. conciousness is just a byproduct of a working brain, you don't choose your actions, your reactions to the enviroment is made up by your nerve system. true morality defined by a higher being is just ridicolous, get off the internet you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idiot it is the workings of Satan. dont you know you can find porn in there? icky

Also i dont even have to prove god doesnt exist, any god worshipped today is either worshipped wrongly or the god is pure evil. if it is the first then your god is either indifferent or not omnipotent if the latter why the ♥♥♥♥ should i even respect its existence.

[Jinx]

引用自 Eretnek：

引用自 Xariot：

All that proves is that society's views on morality change which is exactly what I said. But what you're talking about is accepting when one or more people says "This is bad; This is good," when they don't actually have the right to make that decision. True morality is what is actually good and bad.

You can choose for yourself how to act and what to think, but you can't change the truth of what is good and what is bad. You can convince yourself and you can let others convince you, but the true morality doesn't change based on that.



The changing state of societal moral values changes the truth of what the current state of societal moral values are. It doesn't change true morality.

Free will doesn't blind. Free will gives the ability to choose how we act and what we think. If you are "blind" to true morality, you're blinded by philosophy of men, and by the god that rules the world, who has tried to convice from the beginning just as you even said "There is no true morality," that we can decide for ourselves what is good and bad.

there is no free will you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idiot. conciousness is just a byproduct of a working brain, you don't choose your actions, your reactions to the enviroment is made up by your nerve system. true morality defined by a higher being is just ridicolous, get off the internet you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idiot it is the workings of Satan. dont you know you can find porn in there? icky

Also i dont even have to prove god doesnt exist, any god worshipped today is either worshipped wrongly or the god is pure evil. if it is the first then your god is either indifferent or not omnipotent if the latter why the ♥♥♥♥ should i even respect its existence.

we are all children of jesus, my son

[Eretnek]

引用自 (˃ᆺ˂) ⎛⎝Spanky⎠⎞ (˃ᆺ˂)：

引用自 Eretnek：

there is no free will you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idiot. conciousness is just a byproduct of a working brain, you don't choose your actions, your reactions to the enviroment is made up by your nerve system. true morality defined by a higher being is just ridicolous, get off the internet you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idiot it is the workings of Satan. dont you know you can find porn in there? icky

Also i dont even have to prove god doesnt exist, any god worshipped today is either worshipped wrongly or the god is pure evil. if it is the first then your god is either indifferent or not omnipotent if the latter why the ♥♥♥♥ should i even respect its existence.

we are all children of jesus, my son

And TYNAN is his prophet

[Jinx]

引用自 Eretnek：

引用自 (˃ᆺ˂) ⎛⎝Spanky⎠⎞ (˃ᆺ˂)：

we are all children of jesus, my son

And TYNAN is his prophet

amen

[Oga88]

its not a simulation, its a survival.

[Oga88]

引用自 (˃ᆺ˂) ⎛⎝Spanky⎠⎞ (˃ᆺ˂)：

引用自 Eretnek：

And TYNAN is his prophet

amen

amen

[Jinx]

引用自 Oga88：

引用自 (˃ᆺ˂) ⎛⎝Spanky⎠⎞ (˃ᆺ˂)：

amen

amen

meow :3

[Ensign]

引用自 Xariot：

All that proves is that society's views on morality change which is exactly what I said. But what you're talking about is accepting when one or more people says "This is bad; This is good," when they don't actually have the right to make that decision. True morality is what is actually good and bad.

Right then. What is true morality? The whole point of talking about society is to prove that there is no true morality. So i probably asked the wrong question.

I ask, whats wrong with incest in a moral case? Obviously rape is bad we know why. Why is incest just as bad though morally speaking? No need to get into the social or genetic ramifications since we are talking morality.

[Eretnek]

引用自 Ensign：

引用自 Xariot：

All that proves is that society's views on morality change which is exactly what I said. But what you're talking about is accepting when one or more people says "This is bad; This is good," when they don't actually have the right to make that decision. True morality is what is actually good and bad.

Right then. What is true morality? The whole point of talking about society is to prove that there is no true morality. So i probably asked the wrong question.

I ask, whats wrong with incest in a moral case? Obviously rape is bad we know why. Why is incest just as bad though morally speaking? No need to get into the social or genetic ramifications since we are talking morality.

you should ask why incest is bad if both parties are neutered or using contraception, and the 0.0001% chance there is a baby it gets aborted.

[No-Neck]

Incest was common during America's early years because people were so few and far between. It's just perfect for a game like this.

[Ellena]

Incest is still common. It's a natural thing after all :]

[happyscrub]

引用自 No-Neck：

Incest was common during America's early years because people were so few and far between. It's just perfect for a game like this.

Not only did I initially thought ur comment was false, I spent a few minutes looking it up and found a bunch of stuff that actually spoken of the opposite.