Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You'd be better growing haygrass outside the pen. You'll feed a LOT more animals that way, plus you'll have a reserve in case of a cold snap. I've tried growing haygrass in the pen for the same reason, but it's far too much work for too little benefit.
first of all, the time the plants need to reach 50%growth all the spots are blocked
to not give any nutrition.
then at 50% + animals will eat them,what is also unefficient and a waste.
either make the pen larger, adjust autoslaughter options(you need to have a feeling how many your colony need/can sustain, everything above is a waste of time), split the herde into female/male/races into different pens, grow hay outside and make a 1x1 stockpile only for hay inside the pen, etc, many different solutions.
You're probably better off growing trees.
It wouldn't change the displayed nutrition value. The pen marker is only looking at number of tiles and fertility of the tiles, not what is growing on them. In practice it would likely reduce the actual nutrition in the pen since live hay plants are terribly inefficient.
Cause it dropped to 11.52
I believe because the hay growing tiles just get calculated as blocked tiles.