Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Far as I know, age doesn't have any influence on Social skill rolls.
Speaking strictly of Rimworld, each time a pawn ages a year there's a chance they'll get a condition like dementia, bad back, frail, et cetera. But that doesn't mean age is the same as any of these things. It's perfectly possible to have a 240 year old pawn (since there's no "death by old age" in the game) that's fit as a fiddle if you're extremely lucky with dice rolls, just as it's perfectly possible for your 22 year old pawn to get struck with both dementia and bad back if you're unlucky. Thus, age and any of the above conditions are related by correlation, not causation.
At 99 years pawns will have 3.1 conditions on average, so your 240-year-old-pawn that is "fit as a fiddle" will have around 7 on average.
That's also impossible, since dementia starts rolling at 69, and bad back at 41.
Heads.
Heads.
Heads.
Heads.
Heads.
A weaker man might be moved to re-examine his faith, if in nothing else at least in the law of probability.
See, that I did not know. There's plenty of other ailments commonly attributed to age that starts happening long before that though. Like asthma. Artery blockage. Or cancer.
Still doesn't invalidate my previous point.
80% of pawns will have at least one dementia by the age 99. At least. Good luck flipping coins for your 240-year-old.
Very clever. Especially since the guy they sent was also the body.
Oh, and here's another little tidbit. Unless it's been changed recently (and I know many things have in patch 18-1.0, but I don't think this is one; let's assume it isn't), pawns don't actually have birthdays past 99. And birthdays is what triggers ailments. In other words, someone who is 99 years old will never be able to get an ailment. So 20% of pawns reaching the fabulous age of 99 years - again, these are your words, not mine - will have no ailments. And out of these 20%, approximately (actually, exactly) 100% will not have any ailments if they make it to year 240. So in other words, we've gone from you saying "it's not possible to have a pawn that's 240 years old with no ailments" to you saying "on average, one in five pawns that makes it to 240 years will have no ailments".
Now that's progress!
I mean, maths is fun and all, but the proof is in the pudding, isn't it? Do you think AIP would admit that pawns can actually become old without gaining any ailments if he was shown a screenshot of a pawn who, after artificially being aged with the dev tools on a completely unmodded game from age 17 up to age 99, had absolutely no ailments whatsoever? Something that he claims is impossible? Ladies and gentlemen, place your bets now!
I don't get it. Are you sure that he was not on their territory? That could trigger it. That he died there is just ... a bad accident.
PS: I never have had a pawn of that age and being in that state. How did you kept him alive lol?
Check one's pawn's stats before one does something critical with them that is intimately involved in said stats.
And, as a side-note: Old pawns can accumulate higher skill levels, 'tis true. But, they also have to weather more random dice rolls concerning age-related stat decreases.
For myself, if I'm sending an Emissary, I do all I can to maximize their chances of success. (Today it's Cowboy hats, I guess, and maybe Bowlers? Used to be the Chieftain's Headdress thingy, I think, back when I thought sending an Emissary out for Peace Talks was fun...)
"Peace Talks" are Anti-Fun. Refuse anti-fun game mechanics whenever they insert their blasphemous face!
At 99 years of age, pawns will have 3.1 conditions ON AVERAGE. Some 99-year-old pawns will have 2 conditions, others will have 4. Some will have one condition. Some will have 8 conditions. Some will have ZERO. So, when you said this in reply to Jiggy:
.......you were just flat-out wrong.
A pawn CAN make it to 99 years without a bad back or dementia or whichever. IT IS POSSIBLE. It's just not very common.
Edit: Something else to keep in mind. It's very rare for YOU, the reader (any single reader, AIP or Jigain or M.K. or anybody else) to see a pawn reach age 99 with no conditions. HOWEVER: right now, at this very moment, there are thousands of people playing this game, and hundreds of pawns are aging to 99. So, in the time that it took you to read this, somewhere on Earth, a RimWorld pawn DID reach age 99 without getting saddled with any age-related conditions. It's rare for any ONE pawn--but when there are so many players and so many pawns, rare incidents actually happen on a regular basis.