安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Also, it would've been refused classification due to the cannibalism, feeding prisoners human meat, selling slaves, owning slaves, dressing slaves up in slave garb, beating slaves up, the drug use, the killing people. Just everything, and our classification board is completely stupid lol.
It's the opposite. It's the real world drug parallels that are the problem. Glorification of drugs is pretty much the number one of reason all these bans happen. You can't use them as incentives/rewards (making them not be perceivable as narcotics or giving them significant universal downsides is sufficient to overcome this but the current addiction system in Rimworld can be bypassed with dosage control). Make the drugs more fictional and give them downsides and you pass. Luciferium has both and would pass. Smokeleaf, psychite tea and wakeup all need work. Possibly ambrosia as well though I'd bank it being those three.
Also lets not pretend the classification board isn't government organisation. It's a government statutory body run by members appointed by government as part of Department of Infrastructure the Transport, Regional Development and Communications to enforce Commonwealth Classification Act. It exist in it's current form due to John Howard's government and is maintained by the Liberal party who could fix it any point they felt like it.
And just to enlighten all you sorely confused American's who think the Liberal party are lefties... No. Our left leaning party if called the Labour Party. The Liberal Party is the right wing religious kowtowing party (and both are more right leaning than America's democrats really). And really should you be surprised? Who did you think was against drug use and videogames in general outside the conservatives?
The existence of ANY benefit counts as "illicit or proscribed drug use related to incentives or rewards" regardless of any associated detriments. No matter how bad you make the drug, even a simple "+1 happiness" indicator is viewed as promoting drug use. If there was use without a bonus, it might have gotten an R-18+ rating, or may have been flagged for something else.
There's a lot of speculation, mostly due to the vague and subjective definitions of our classifications, but officially, the totally-not-weed providing any statistical benefit is an immediate ban on it's own.
While it's true that most things can be chalked up to incompetency, with politicians in general though it's almost always corruption. When a government, especially one like Australia's is no longer held accountable by their citizens and has no oversight (as we've witnessed the last year especially), almost everything they do is corrupt.
That's why it costs a million dollars for a public art project that I could make and install for 20k and still make a huge profit relative to the work I did. Governments regularly money launder especially anything art related because it's almost impossible to account for money on something like art which is subjective.
So for sure that art corruption bleeds over into video games.
That's why red dead redemption 2 is okay in Australia when you take cocaine as a buff and can kill whoever you want, but rimworld isn't. Rockstar probably regularly has to bribe politicians for their games.
it can be boiled down to tolerating that which is intolerable to a sane and civil society. thats the lame mans way of explaining it. thats the upper limit of what can be said thanks to whos in charge and what they are so happy to do to people who know better then to buy lies and gas lighting.