Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Bedrooms are +3~8 Mood
Barracks are at best like +0~3
Which is awesome, but also... You can easily get other mood modifiers or rely on bedrooms for your mood modifier.
Tho certain stuff need good bedrooms.
Using a dorm late game is risking breaks on all major negative events.
Dorms are for slaves so you can focus suppression items without wasting resources. Dorms allow you to maximise slaves most important mechanic. Hospitals are also great for dorms. So you are correct about their usage.
I wish barracks were better for normal colonists. It's just too many downsides.
Your pawns will get mood bonuses for sleeping in a spacious room, and with fewer sculptures etc required to cover the entire space (because it's all the one same room), don't be surprised if your pawns favour the barracks (your dormitory) rather than using individual rooms.
If you have Royalty, and you decide to rank up some titled psycasters (as opposed to tribal psycasters), then 6x5 bedrooms will be useful.
What I would do is use a barracks room to start with, build individual bedrooms, and use those bedrooms for recruiting prisoners - then switch them to regular bedrooms as recruits join you, and see where people go for sleep.
Eventually you'll also want more storage area, and the barracks area can be repurposed.
Room Sense will give you a colour-coded visual representation of how appealing a room is. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1355637255
Automatic Bed Reassignment will allow your pawns to dynamically choose their own sleeping areas, picking the beds they feel is best. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2404555784
This mixed approach has worked great, imo.
The bonus of barracks is that it uses a lot less space and slightly lower wealth increase.
i.e. You can make a "extremely impressive" barracks (which basically nullifies the penalty for a shared bedroom) that sleeps like 10-15 pawns in the same amount of space as what would be only 2 private bedrooms and using the exact same amount of furniture and decor (other than more beds)
The main benefit for private bedrooms is higher mood bonuses. In addition to getting the bonus for sleeping in an impressive bedroom, pawns who are coupled up will get the bonus for "Got Some lovin'" far more frequently in private rooms (or at least it sure seems that way to me). It's a pretty significant bonus, so for couples I like to give them private rooms.
Titled pawns (royalty DLC) and pawns with the "jealous trait" also need to have a private bedroom to prevent significant mood penalties. I, personally, hate the jealous trait but when I do get a pawn who has it who I want to keep I just give them a title too and bring them up to the top rank where I'd need to give them the best bedroom despite the trait. LOL
If royality is involved or I get a pawn that needs an extra room (which I usually never take) I go for some single rooms but the majority still sleeps in barracks.
There is a ton of ways to raise mood, even more so with the ideology DLC. You can safely throw in even a paste dispenser if you have drugs that keep your pawns happy which are distributed in a way that allows for no addiction chance. Psychite tea is good for this, 12 mood buff for no stat debuffs at all. Can be mass produced very easily, you can even have all pawns on addiction and you won't feel it.
"Can" it work?
Sure, it's not forbidden, so a player could only use one large dormitory-style room if they wanted.
Is it a good idea?
No.
There are threads on this, including some pretty infamous ones... The key takeaway you need to know is that you can not as easily control for all the things you need to control for if you use a Dormitory system. You are also removing the ability to get substantial benefits for some of your colonists and may be forced to accept substantial penalties, too.
In short - It can be done, but it's not the best option. Players who routinely choose this method are largely doing so just out of personal choice, not for any long-term advantages IMO.
For myself, I only use such a system in the early game and quickly move to individual bedrooms as soon as I can. I also always build Double-Beds in every bedroom to remove the need for frequent replacement due to relationship issues and to more properly stage my colony to reflect end-game housing. I do sometimes vary the standard size of bedrooms, here and there, between plays. But, that's just a play choice as I don't like "min/max" play every session.
Cabana/Village living accommodations with separate buildings or duplexes for colonists are possible, too, and can make for some interesting play.
Large-scale populations outside the normal scope of play tend to force the player to make decisions that may not be sensible, otherwise. If you're routinely playing with over 20 pawns, you may need to adjust your play and choices accordingly.
For a hospital, there's really no downside and quite a few upsides to making it a dormitory-style, no private room, area. Medical Monitors are expensive and have a "range" of effect, so multiple beds can be stacked around one and get the same bonuses. The same goes for TV's, of course. Just be sure to control for frequent sleep disturbances by locking doors that could promote travel through the hospital.
(ie: Hospital areas are usually constructed so the injured can quickly be moved to them from the "battlefield." That means its likely they will eventually be situated in such a way to provide quick access to "Outside" and the like, maybe encouraging casual travel through them. To control for that, just manually lock the doors leading to other areas and manually unlock them as needed during/after fights. OR - Simply give them only one entrance, but with a very accessible hallway nearby that leads to other base areas. Self-contained buildings work too.)
For a prison area, there is no reason to create individual cells. It's actually less efficient and more troublesome to deal with individual cells than it is with one Dorm-style holding cell. Prisoners have a very limited suite of AI behavior/mechanics available to them, so managing them is not the same as it is with colonists. Some players do like trying to emulate "Prison Architect," though. There's a selection of mods for that sort of play, too. (Use them if you want individual cells/PA sort of play.)
The main use of barracks is very early game when you don't have the time to build bedrooms and sculptures for everyone. You can make a very large room, like a dining/storage room, into a barracks and lean heavily on room size for early impressiveness to barely cancel the barracks penalty. You'll still usually end up with disturbed sleep though unless you start making "roomlets" in this big barracks at which point you are dangerously close to just having individual rooms and might as well take that step.
The difference between a bedroom and barracks is like 7-8 mood including disturbed sleep. You can make up that difference if you want, it's not vitally important, but getting mood from bedrooms is such an easy thing to do that it's hard to justify ignoring it and using other sources of mood instead just to save space. Space isn't really an issue on any normal sized map, but I suppose could be a concern on a SOS2 ship or something.