Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Pretty much every corporation is pro-communism these days
Sweet, I always thought they'd be the holdouts. That solves the 'fleeing capital' problem. :)
Imagine believing this.
Just lmao
Man, what madman would say "I would like to live on Rimworld"?
It seems akin to saying "I'd like to die on Rimworld." Because one would. Quickly.
I don't wish for an existence where I have to contend with pirate raids and swarms of man-eating megabeavers. Let alone in a survivalist military force or a neo-feudal society.
None of our Rimworlds sound appealing. No world watched over by Randy is one you should want to live in.
Yeah, that makes sense. I was just wondering why nobility and class system is seen as the 'normal' option, I thought it was a funny observation to point out that you called that normal.
Because there is an expansion dedicated to that variant of gameplay. Normalcy through intended gameplay loops. Playing a colony of cannibal raiders can be fun, but considering you need to use a mod to ensure your population is okay with butchering and eating people would suggest that this is unintended gameplay (as it is very difficult to achieve in vanilla Rimworld (until now)) and therefore abnormal. Normal is a description, it is not a prescription.