安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題的作者已將一篇留言標為問題解答。
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
If you can't play with higher difficulty. I recommend downloading mods. Change the theme of the game to the ones you wanted, perhaps with some op mods to balance out your odds against the game.
- Randy Savage (see also: Cassie Merciless)
- No save scumming/commitment mode (*)
- Tundra (see also: Ice Sheet, Desert, Cold Bog, Tropical Swamp)
- No automated defenses -- no traps or turrets allowed
- Quality of life. graphics/sound, and AI mods only
- Go to space
The "no automated defenses" part makes it quite challenging, since you actually need to actively fight every battle. You may need to restart 2 or 3 times since you're vulnerable for the first year. You're going to need to do a lot of drugs, especially for the final gauntlet on the way to space. But it's a quite rewarding run.
My QoL-only mods (none of these alter gameplay very much):
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1750179796
(*) You might want to do "reload anytime" instead of commitment mode because your same game could be corrupted, especially if you use mods. Just pretend it's commitment mode. You need a little self-dicipline for this, because your favorite pawns *will* die to random predators while wandering around. C'est la vie.
When you start a colony, do you think about how and why your colonists ended up together? Do you look at the relationships tab? Do you set goals or think about your pawn's motivations? You don't have to do the spaceship ending... You can set any goals or conditions you want.
The story teller in game is the one giving you components to a story, but they aren't writing the story for you. You have to string all the stuff together in a way that makes sense. How do your colonists feel about the things that have been happening? What does that make them want to do? How would you feel about the pirates that constantly attack you and your friends as you were only trying to build up some shelter and scrape together enough food to get by? Would you look at each raid as just another challenge to overcome, or would you eventually start taking it personally?
Try to stop playing the game and start digging a little deeper and you'll find the stories.
And I kept wondering why I was so bored all the time...
I still don't like losing my pawns to random stuff, though. But I did try a new approach and finding myself enjoying the game a lot more: I just started with one guy and only a bare minimum of starting resources. Albeit a sort of superman with killer stats. But because he is just one pawn, I do need to make priorities. Right now, another 3 pawns have joined his farmstead, one is an addict and another a pyromaniac. But I'm more fine with it now, as I can "identify" with the original pawn and if the "sub-par" pawns start to become more trouble then they are worth, I won't mind letting them die, or kicking them out. I do realize that my "main man" might die eventually, but I hope to have built a legacy by that time, so that I'll continue playing and see how the "sub-optimals" manage. See if they can make something of the legacy left behind, or maybe they'll mess things up.
The pyro was my second pawn, so when she went on a pyro spree, I had only the one pawn to put out all the fires... Lucky me, she started the fires outdoors in my agricultural fields, and not in the middle of my base...
I wouldn't recommend "increase the difficulty level and choose a crazier narrator" to someone who was trying to find new ways to play the game or to make it more funnerer...
The key is just to play the game differently than you've played it before. Increasing the difficulty while playing the same way you've played in the past doesn't have as much of a chance to make the game more enjoyable as just "doing something different."
Some choices that might help:
A different biome than one normally plays. It doesn't have to be more difficult, it just has to be different than what you normally choose. For those who like a certain sort of biome and find themselves playing in that one more often, this is probably the "#1 Choice." Guess what? You'll see stuff you've never seen, before. You'll deal with animals you haven't had to deal with, have entirely different options to choose from for food, materials, base-building, etc... Muffalos and forests filled with wood aren't everywhere. :)
"Do more" - Choose to go on those caravan quests you might not have, otherwise. Yes, making swords and platemail might be fun instead of fast-tracking to assault rifles.
If you're looking for more challenges with combat, maybe making one giant killbox isn't the way to go? Leave some vulnerabilities in your base - The attackers may not always choose to use them, but when they do it's going to be more "fun."
When trying to figure out how to concoct one's own "gameplay rules" don't just think about things that might help to make the game more difficult, but think of things that might bring something "new" to your experience. How about only recruiting Paws that are Night Owls? Maybe set age requirements you don't normally prefer? Elderly pawns don't last long, but they have tons of skills.
Mods - Rimworld is wonderful unmodded, but can be even more betterer when it's modded. Choose some QoL mods that aren't overpowered and then find a mod that actually adds something to the game. (I'm building a "Hotel Apache" in the wasteland inspired by Orion's "Hospitality Mod" and it's a ton of fun. That's not just because of the mod, but because it's brought with it "different" and "more funnerer" gameplay as a result. :)
TLDR: Play differently, not necessarily harder.
And the most important part: don't save scum. You won't get any interesting stories by doing that. Even if your base gets destroyed and 90 % of your colonists killed. That's your story and rebuilding is part of that. (I know it can be frustrating. I sometimes need to take a break from the game, because randy decides to throw ♥♥♥♥ in my face for multiple hours straight. :D)
I strongly agree with all the other stuff you wrote. But, here, I have to disagree.
Save-Scum when it's best for what you want to do.
The Anti-Save-Scumming establishment has run rampant over the Steam forums and gaming in general. :) It's just a tool, like any other tool. The choice to use it is yours. It's fine if you don't want to use it, too. But, some players might really want to use it and shouldn't feel bad about doing it. Moving the mouse is part of the game, so why not reloading saves? :)
That being said, playing an iron-man game can be fun, too, in-and-of-itself. But, always playing Iron Man (ie: Committment mode/whatever the Anti-Save-Scumming "politically correct" movement is calling it these days), goes against the "Do something different" rule and, IMO, the DSD Rule is paramount for good gameplay discoveries in frequently played games. :)
However you choose to play the game makes no difference to anyone else. There's nothing scummy about reloading and there's nothing valiant about commitment mode for me, but if there is for you, good for you.
^-- This.
I'm in favor of whatever brings the gamer enjoyment, just so long as it doesn't hurt anyone else's.