Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I hope that is clear and concise while still giving an idea on what's happening.
En respuesta al articulo de Vice los desarrolladores cancelaron el contrato con la promotora del juego, aparentemente muchas personas habian comprado el juego por esa promotora, lo cual causo que se escribieran resenas negativas y se llenaran los foros de spam.
Se que suena absurdo, pero juro que digo la verdad :v
-Vtuber plays game she loves a LOT on stream, pitches it to whoever she collabs with and stuff because she legitimately loves the game and it isn't doing well.
-The company eventually gives her a link to use for tracking purchases made via her streams, has her try out beta builds and patches, has the devs play with her, etc. Was even going to have a character in the game based on her (supposedly.)
-Eventually gets an actual sponsorship complete with small portion of sales made via her link.
-Vtuber covers entertainment and political news as well, with a big thing being her work on DEI and BRIDGE. One article she eventually covers is a Vice article from someone who talks negatively about an adult Vtuber company called VAllure.
-Vtuber announces a vacation coming up. Proceeds to go on vacation for a week.
-One day into vacation, the article writer of the VAllure piece writes an article talking extensively about the Vtuber, their sponsorship via a recent Gamersupps campaign, and the latter's lack of denouncing the former.
-Two days later, according to the Vtuber, the company sends her an email saying the sponsorship is terminated effective immediately. Company denies any talks between Vtuber, her manager, any sort of PR team, and reports the decision is "unanimous" from the company - again, all per her.
-A second article comes out from the writer of the first two specifically targeting the Vtuber with no-context quotes and clips.
-Vtuber announced the sponsorship ending this past Friday or so. Encouraged people to leave reviews being respectful but letting them know if they support or are disappointed with the company's actions - basically "you have a voice, use it."
-We are here now. Now is then, then will be now, but now is already gone (or whatever that whole bit was from Spaceballs.)
Personally, I think everyone should do their own research into both the article, writer, and streamer and determine if the right move was made or not, and not just go off one or the other because "it sounds good." My opinion is the streamer in question, while more right-leaning, is by far not an extremist, nor a nazi or neo-nazi, and while I don't agree with every opinion she has, doesn't have anything that I would see as worthy of sponsorship being dropped, especially over the quality of articles and lack of research / context brought about in them.
ta
c
a
b
r
o
n
el asunto
ok this is the best answer, and thank you xD now I understand the picture quite well.
people crying over some vtuber, it'll pass
osea ....la vtuber es un ...show completo? por show me refiero a todo un personaje cancelable?
y gente empezo a webiar en twitter para que borraran esa campaña pero al mismo tiempo ese sitio tiene otra donacion para un asesino
y kirsche apunto que no deberian quitar ninguna de las dos campañas por que eso seria doble estandar y lo del articulo amarillista es por que las opiniones de kirsche son contrarias a la "aceptable"