Its a real shame you can't co-op the campaign.

[The Bunny In the Bush]

It seems like a missed opportunity, the second player barely even need to be intergrated, just be an underling.

[GSHunter]

Yeah true, the "offline" mode is so much better then the online mode

[Bubbles the Soap Dragon]

It'd be incredible if I could yoink a friend or two to take control of team members that'd otherwise be bots.

I figure they'd either have to sit out solo missions, or have to play as no-name "soldiers" for them, but those aren't the bulk of the campaign anyway.

[Future]

Yeah it's kind of a shame, but i feel like it would be an tremendous amount of programming and work to get it to work co-op.

[Pablo231]

could be cool

[Das_Daw]

It would be real cool to be able to coop the campaign. I don't know if there are technical issues preventing this, or what, but I would like to this this added waaay more than any other content.

[Pablo231]

i think only turf wars could be wacky but even waiting for "HOST" that didn't use any soldier to protect his ground could be cool enough just to be acceptable.

[Das_Daw]

Originally posted by Pablo231:

i think only turf wars could be wacky but even waiting for "HOST" that didn't use any soldier to protect his ground could be cool enough just to be acceptable.

For sure there are some kinks that need to be worked out (also regarding progession etc.) but even if it doesn't end up being perfect, it would still be more fun than just more of the exististing MP content

[Daminionz]

main reason me and my mates did not end up buying the game honestly. I thought the roguelite map thing looked sick but once I read its singleplayer only we just went yeah nah thats a hard skip then.

[Tuck NoriuZ]

Originally posted by Future:

Yeah it's kind of a shame, but i feel like it would be an tremendous amount of programming and work to get it to work co-op.

make them eyes in the skye could be one of them :P

[BiGDaDdY]

Yep sure sounds hard considering Diablo 1 which came out in 1997 had single player co op and multiplayer amazing how games today have raised the bar on wait they cant do simple campaign co op that Diablo did in 1997.

[Wingnut Mcmoomoo]

Originally posted by BiGDaDdY:

Yep sure sounds hard considering Diablo 1 which came out in 1997 had single player co op and multiplayer amazing how games today have raised the bar on wait they cant do simple campaign co op that Diablo did in 1997.

honestly... like for real... not even trying to be mean... but this thing that you typed took an impressive level of ignorance in alot of things to even say. Its like if a child tells you that stars are alien headlights. Its the same level of misunderstanding the world.

I hope you have a good day tho, I'm not trying to even weigh in on the convo but your post impressed me.

[Sasha Pines (no brain)]

i think is the desync problem more then anything else just look at mp mission so many time it got bug

[Pablo231]

Originally posted by Sasha Pines (no brain):

i think is the desync problem more then anything else just look at mp mission so many time it got bug

i'm just guessing devs are toooo lazy just to add coop in campaing. a LOT of games were made at UNREAL ENGINE 4 and they are multiplayer games. PUBG was made at this game engine, Fortnite, Ark: Survival Evolved.
they always could just made just "experimental" version where host could be the only person to be able tocontrol main characters in things like story missions where there is only 1 character at mission and just put rest on some sort of waiting room or simple just spectate what is going on.

[Banana Boogaloo]

full coop would make me never stop playing this game

[Coffee]

Originally posted by Pablo231:

Originally posted by Sasha Pines (no brain):

i think is the desync problem more then anything else just look at mp mission so many time it got bug

i'm just guessing devs are toooo lazy just to add coop in campaing. a LOT of games were made at UNREAL ENGINE 4 and they are multiplayer games. PUBG was made at this game engine, Fortnite, Ark: Survival Evolved.
they always could just made just "experimental" version where host could be the only person to be able tocontrol main characters in things like story missions where there is only 1 character at mission and just put rest on some sort of waiting room or simple just spectate what is going on.

It's not being lazy, it would require a total redesign.