Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So Inifnite Warfare is not better Optimized than Bo3 and ill get more lag in it?
actually yes.im getting lots of lag and dcs on top of that.when i played bo3 on free weekend i didnt have problems
I couldn't get into BO3 multiplayer, but IW? 100+ hours.
I don't play zombies that much but I'd say IW ones are better.
You should get IW, but if you have 144hz monitor, then don't. Multiplayer is locked on 90fps (or 100, not sure). I don't have a 144hz monitor, but I heard it's bad.
Basically, IW is average, BO3 is bad.
Multiplayer is just a huge bloodbath (as usual).
Unbalanced weapons in both games.
Loot boxes.
And low amount of players.
If you want to play COD multiplayer, get a console, because servers are almost empty. I mostly play CODs for campaign. MW2, MW3, AW and IW were exceptions.
As a side note, it's a shame that Katee Sackhoff was in BOIII instead of IW, because IW had a major Battlestar Galactica vibe to it. Actually it was more like Space: Above and Beyond, but either way... she would have been in her element there. BOIII was just weird, but not in a good way.