安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I hope you are being sarcastic. If you are, then, fine. But, COD has used the same antiquated Quake engine for going on 10 years. They have added stuff to it, but, that does not make "new."
Think of it this way, lets say you had an old Pentium IV computer. Every year, you add a new GPU, new ram and a new HDD. Does that make it a new computer? The MOBO is still t he same and so is the CPU. So, the answer is no. Its not really anything new. None of the updates can be fully taken advantage of because the main core components are crap.
Nvida seems like the better preformer for lots of games. it really depends on what games you play.
for basically everything i recommend a gtx 1070 for 1080p 144hz or 1440p 60hz
as for what new card would likely solve all issues, 480 or a 1060 would be the sensible recommendation based on current system specs / budget estimation.
there are a lot of yotube videos who shows u the difference like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15Fw_bOLyqI
https://www.amazon.com/Gigabyte-GeForce-Graphics-GV-N1070G1-GAMING-8GD/dp/B01H0WU884/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1484451364&sr=8-3&keywords=1070gtx
https://www.amazon.com/MSI-GAMING-GTX-1070-8G/dp/B01GXOX3SW/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1484451635&sr=8-5&keywords=1070gtx
https://www.amazon.com/ASUS-GeForce-STRIX-Graphic-STRIX-GTX1070-O8G-GAMING/dp/B01HDUVJ1I/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1484451635&sr=8-6&keywords=1070gtx
https://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-Support-Graphics-08G-P4-6173-KR/dp/B01GX5YWAO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1484451635&sr=8-1&keywords=1070gtx
there is no difference between all these cards. asus/msi/gigabyte cost a few bucks more for a little more boost clock but this means nothing. i bought a cheap evga sc (compare to 1080 strix) and my stable oc is 2126MHz. a friend bought a asus strix 1080 for 150€ more then my card (was release) and cant pass 2050MHz.
I would guess it depends on the engine the game uses. Frostbite might handle texture loading way different then the IW-Engine. Beside that the engines Dice used were always more hardwarefriendly in my opinion. You would get great results on lower spec machines. I don't know if Infinite Ward already changed their engine or they still just "updating" it for every game. Even the new Unreal4-Engine have nasty textureloading on a GTX 1080 and was always the problem with this engine. Not everygame that used this engine but there were a couple.
But as other mentioned to the topic creator it really looks like the graphic card just can't load the textures because lack of vram.