安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Lol
It's also not the best out of the elder scrolls series, not the worst as that dishonour would be ESO.
To be anything close to the marvel some people believe it to be you have to use umpteen mods. Much like minecraft in that way.
It is however not character driven unlike the witcher so comparisons arent going to be balanced. Skyrim might have better ranged combat or spell slinging but again thats not part of the story and character of geralt.
A truly open world with absolutely nothing interesting happening.
I don't care how many years it took to make skyrim. It was 6 btw. And both of those games have more load times than this one. So no...they are not any more open world than this game.
Skyrim isn't a 7 year old game man. It isn't even 4 years old. Will be very soon though.
witcher 3 bangs skyrim
im sick of skyrim anyway
I have days that I enjoy Skyrim more than the Witcher 3, then I have days that I enjoy The Witcher 3 more than Skyrim.
Only "dymanic" thing about Skyrim is which dumb dialogue the guard is gonna chose.
Skyrim was more like a good sandbox RPG technical demonstrator in need of some soul.
Do you really expect tes 6, that will come out next year or the year after if fallout 4 comes first, to be worst than skyrim?
If skyrim was only 2 years old why not, but in this instance it was developed with the old gen console in mind too.