Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No matter how you look at it - she's OP. Always was. Her being a witcher doesn't change much, realistically.
Dunno how it'll turn out, but I wish if they were sticking on the Witcher route, that they'd tell the story of one of the other Witchers in the universe. Maybe focus their story more on mythology rather than the politics that took a major part of the trilogy we got.
The biggest issue we have now with Witcher 4 coming around, is that they are trying to girl boss the heck out of Ciri to appease a certain crowd of people. The only way I see they can explain Ciri becoming a Witcher and being able to handle the alchemical tonics Witchers drink is because of her Elder Elven Blood allowing her to withstand the changes these tonics physically make to ones body upon undertaking the Trial of the Grasses.
The biggest gripe most of us fans have, is the fact that CDPR is willing to do this to a beloved character that was loved just the way she was. Hell, Ciri could even visit alternate worlds/dimensions already, she even explains her time in a more 'Distopian' world with flying carriages and odd 'magic'. A.K.A., Night City in Cyberpunk 2077. But the developers have even stated in many reviews, they are making Witcher 4 for, 'Modern' Audiences and 'People who don't play our games.' For DEI practices and to appease a certain demographic.
Don't get me wrong, Ciri being the main character in Witcher 4 was expected and a LOT of the fanbase is looking forward to. But the way they are going about it, horrendous. Even a lot of their higher up Devs are leaving the company to create their own Studios because they are tired of the direction things are going. It's a sad time for gaming in this day and age and if things keep going the way they are; expect The Witcher franchise to fall much like Dragon Age.
For good reason, it seems media literacy is very lacking, people complaining that writing is to heavy handed when things like "The Boys" was heavy handed and people still missed the point.
You have to near on hit people over the head with a bat with the intended message engraved on it for some to understand.
- Geralt's story has come to a satisfying end and he is now retired in Toussaint, so a new adventure with him would be repetitive and forced.
- Jacek Rozenek, the Polish voice of Geralt, suffered a severe stroke and his voice deteriorated to the point, where he probably wouldn't be able to handle an entire game as the protagonist, let alone whole trilogy.
Ciri is a fine character in her own right and special to the story but her becoming the next Witcher, regardless of how they justify it was always going to be a conflict. We all know why they chose the harder route.
The books have nothing to do with this, because they take place BEFORE the games. At the time the games take place, Geralt from the books is dead.
Polish players don't care about Doug Cockle, and they are CDP's priority. CDP writes Witcher games in Polish, with Polish voice actors in mind. Only later do they translate them into other languages, including English. That's why the game contains a lot of references and wordplay that only Poles will understand. CDP themselves stated that without Rozenek there is no Geralt.
1. No real world politics here. That'll get deletions, warns and bans. It's in the Rules and there's a big warning on the main boards.
2. The Bloody Baron quest? In which case, it was designed by Pawel Sasko, who still works for CDPR. From the witcher series, Adam Badowski, Board member and director of Witcher 2 (and Cyberpunk 2077); Philipp Weber, Quests, Witcher 3; Miles Tost, level design, Witcher 3; Marcin Blacha, story, Witcher 3; Sebastian Kalemba, animation director, W3 and many many many others are still at CDPR. They have people there still all the way back to Witcher 1.
If you are referring to Rebel Wolves, there are some CDPR devs there, as well as at many other studios. CDPR wishes them all the best, of course.
Sometimes, people are just plain wrong and suggesting the majority, or even a great number of Witcher devs aren't with CDPR, or that it has somehow become a totally different company, is just plain wrong.
And now let us return to topic: does Ciri have to be a Witcher?