Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you want a successful sequel, you have to attract new people. If you aren't aiming for a new audience with every release, you are doing it wrong.
Time to consolidate the player base instead, no ?
This.
Their goal is to always expand.
You seem to not understand how capitalism works.
You are talking about Dragon Age the Veilguard, whose producer purchased the mythical 'Modern audience" ? Or Concord, the game for the "modern audience" ? And so on...
you seem to not understand how players "work"
Every franchise that wants to sustain and grow needs new audiences. I have no idea why are people so up against a basic capitalist principle.
Tell us about Concord, or Dragon Age the Veilguard, then.
Chase and create quality first and people will notice. Chase people first and quality often becomes a second thought.
And capitalism need ? ..... clients, thanks.