How Is Redemption 2 Open World Better Wild Hunt?

[pjedilord]

People claim Redemption 2 open world is best open world game,how is there
open world better than Wild Hunt? How does it bring much more?

What did people prefer best why? Wild Hunt is RTX 57gb Redemption 2 not
RTX is 150gb strange? as Wild Hunt looks better.
People getting better performance now RTX?

[Lukaskobra]

Originally posted by pjedilord:

as Wild Hunt looks better.
People getting better performance now RTX?

RDR2 looks much better, thats my personal opinion and pretty much 99% of people, RDR2 is generally much more detailed and higher quality in graphics than wild hunt

[Crumb]

Rdr2 is a great open world game but not better than tw3 imo, but that is matter of personal preference anyway.

[Ernasty]

RDR2 blows most other games out of the water graphically, including The Witcher 3.

I'm still playing Witcher 3's recent update with RTX off.

[Ernasty]

I prefer The Witcher 3 cause magic & swords are more interesting to me than guns & cowboys.

[cgillmore85]

Witcher 3 with RTX enabled looks better than RDR2. It's not even close.

[felixpoop]

RDR2 is a great looking game, but Witcher 3 is beautiful.

[LordOfTheBread]

Well, at first RDR2 released 3 years later but most importantly it was made on Rockstar money.

Witcher 3 was made with 80m usd, RDR2 with between 200 and 300M USD.

Thinking sbout it that is testament on how good TW3 turned out with way less budget.

[Metro]

Rdr2 Open world is great but meh I prefer an open world full of monsters and magic. so, for me the witcher 3 is better

[󠀡󠀡󠀡󠀡]

Red Dead Redemption 2 is better looking graphically no question, even better than Witcher 3 Wild hunt.

But Witcher III Wild Hunt is far better in term of plot, character development, dynamic quests, mechanics and fantasy setting, also one thing RDR2 has superior to Witcher 3 is realism like Animals have real life like behaviors, whilst Witcher 3 only focused on fantasy setting but still Witcher 3 if not for graphics far outweighs red dead redemption 2, RDR 2 is nothing in front of Witcher 3 literally nothing not even spec dust in terms of game-play and everything that a game should be.

[LordOfTheBread]

Which has the better plot is subjective, I think both games have great stories, superb voice acting and ebgaging plots.

in terms of open-worlds tho I feel RDR2 is a notch better. Sadly I find that, as good as the world is, it is painfully underutilized and both games would benefit greatly from taking pointers from BOTW and Elden Ring to make their open-worlds more engaging.

[Guardian of the Blind]

Raytracing does actually barely need any HDD space, because it is all just code. RDR 2 is so much bigger, because it generally has a higher fidelity. It's a newer game done by one of the biggest and best studios in the world. CDPR is tiny compared to the monstrum that is rockstar.
Witcher 3 is imo a much better and way less tedious game, but RDR2 is supperior with it's graphics and the open world fidelity. Witcher 3 reuses many assets many times (which also safes a lot of space on your drive)

[Guardian of the Blind]

Originally posted by Guardian of the Blind:

Raytracing does actually barely need any HDD space, because it is all just code. RDR 2 is so much bigger, because it generally has a higher fidelity. It's a newer game done by one of the biggest and best studios in the world. CDPR is tiny compared to the monstrum that is rockstar.
Witcher 3 is imo a much better and way less tedious game, but RDR2 is supperior with it's graphics and the open world fidelity. Witcher 3 reuses many assets many times (which also safes a lot of space on your drive)

For a real example: the original quake 2 is 760mb and quake 2 rtx, which looks vastly superior on almost every level is only 1gb

[Ernasty]

Originally posted by cgillmore85:

Witcher 3 with RTX enabled looks better than RDR2. It's not even close.

lol, this is objectively false

witcher 3 is a better game but it doesn't come close to RDR2 graphically

[Cootswig]

Originally posted by Ernasty:

Originally posted by cgillmore85:

Witcher 3 with RTX enabled looks better than RDR2. It's not even close.

lol, this is objectively false

witcher 3 is a better game but it doesn't come close to RDR2 graphically

I haven't played rdr2 but I've seen many videos. I would say tw3 comes close or even looks better depending on what style you like.

[Guardian of the Blind]

Originally posted by Cootswig:

Originally posted by Ernasty:

lol, this is objectively false

witcher 3 is a better game but it doesn't come close to RDR2 graphically

I haven't played rdr2 but I've seen many videos. I would say tw3 comes close or even looks better depending on what style you like.

and you think highly compressed yt videos can properly show the difference in fidelity? RDR 2 has objectively way better graphics.