Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And I don´t care who was Uma in truth, just wondering if it was something ocult there :P
Thanks all
Actually, no, the reason that the practice was discontinued was not because it was barbaric. If you haven't noticed, the whole world of the Witcher is barbaric. It was discontinued, at least at the school of the Wolf, because when the keep came under siege, a lot of their information was destroyed. Back when the Schools like Kaer Morhen actually were active, they would keep 'School Mages' who were the only people that knew the secrets of the Trial of the Grasses at the time. So when they died in the attack, the knowledge was lost for a long time. By the time they found it again, it was just a silent agreement between members of the School of the Wolf to not train any more as is. Most of the other schools faced similar destruction within the lore of the stories. The Trial of the Grasses couldn't be 'discontinued' if you wanted Witchers to continue to be made. For example, imagine a cake, you can substitute some ingredients for others, or leave some out entirely, and you'll still get a cake. But the Witcher requires extremely specific ingredients that cannot be altered or taken out. You can add stuff to it, like Geralt, who after the trials was given more since he took so well to it, and thus you got a Witcher 2.0.