Assassin Creed Odyssey Better Than Wild Hunt?

[pjedilord]

I was thinking if think Assassin Creed Odyssey is better than Wild Hunt?
Assassin Creed Odyssey is great game and has stuning vast amount of places
and looks better than wild hunt, but think Wild Hunt scenes may be better looking.
I think Wild Hunt story is more depth, but story is enjoyable and interesting in ACO
The combat is certainly better than Wild Hunt and much better horse controls.
What best ACO or Wild Hunt? i think people should have both due to both great games.
Only played 80 hours in ACO and Wild Hunt 564 hours.
Be great if they made the New RTX version looking like ACO the sequel to Wild Hunt
should look better than ACO.

[Gaunter O'Dimm]

Glad to see you're still posting nonsense around here pjedi

[The Commendatore]

yas

[MagniusGlorius]

odyssey is nothing compared to the power that witcher 3 wields

[rui.silva.incp]

I will indulge because I actually own both games.

They are different.

I would pick Wild Hunt every single day.

. I can agree that controls are better in ACO, they are indeed

. graphics? it looks a bit more flashy. I will debate if cities look anywhere as they look in Wild Hunt. ACO cities are all pretty much copy paste from one another. And after you climb your 1000th temple you will get that feeling of "been here, done this". Its not like you change from White Orchard to Velen, later to Skellige....and they all have their own landscape and feel. In ACO almost all places start to look the same after some hours.

Combat?
ACO has much less variety of enemies.
And once you play a couple hours, you will find yourself using the same combo moves all the time. It looks flashy but.....after some hours its nothing special. Wild Hunt can be easy but at least it has different enemies and you can trash them around using different skills / strategies.

Stealth in ACO is cool. I will give you that. It has been better in other AC games but its cool and The Witcher does not have that.

Story?
Here there is nothing to tell.
ACO story goes all over the place. Silly teenage kind of jokes that make you feel you are playing a video game. It brakes your immersion constantly. The whole core quest wants to make you play both sides of the war which does not make sense. And its not even a story like Wild Hunt where people change sides or are forced to work with their enemies for good reasons. In ACO you just do missions for one side or the other depending on the region you are in. The core story which should hold everything together is terribly loose and goes all over the place.

Then there is gameplay.....
Kill enemy captain, burn supplies, loot treasure box
ohh and battle to change region owner to farm xp
same thing EVERYWHERE! Once you complete 5 regions you start to think "hell....there are so many more regions....is this going to be always exactly the same?".....and it is.......it mostly is.

I will give that ACO has less bugs and at least to me everything seems to be working fine. Its a game for a more general audience maybe. But it just lacks atmosphere.

[pjedilord]

Great reply thanks, is the AC viking improved?

[Gaunter O'Dimm]

Valhalla is an absolute trainwreck when compared to Origins or Odyssey

[pjedilord]

Messaggio originale di Gaunter O'Dimm:

Valhalla is an absolute trainwreck when compared to Origins or Odyssey

Hi they should of picked more interesting place, looks boring, would of thought they
improve gameplay.

[pjedilord]

With ACO looking for main character who could be in vast amount of places,
But looking for Ciri who can only look in town, city or viking town, so prefered how
they improved looking for main character in ACO better.
Think Wild Hunt is better though with proper missions.

[YoloMeister]

Heelllll noooo...