How deep is W3 in comparison to Bethesda RPGs?

[FINAL_Bₒₛₛ]

?

[SKADRIL]

Trey Parker described The Witcher 3 perfectly. It's a cutscene hunter.

[v0]

dont wanna spoil your potential fun so i'll only mention positive part. ime tw3's strong in getting you to ponder decisions. plus visual/audio atmosphere. that's pretty much all.

[homek76]

I wrote it a few minutes ago in another thread on these forums.

Beth games are nearly all about explorating and are lackluster in storytelling.

Witcher is the exact opposite. A huge and beatuiful, but mostly empty world, but great quests and quest resolutions. Witcher 3 is one gigantic cutscene with some exploration and fighting in between ;-)

[brawler]

Storytelling is better in Witcher compared to the latest Beth titles.

[Red™]

Blood and Wine have more depth and content compared to Fallout 4, and it’s a DLC.

[homek76]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Eminem:

Diposting pertama kali oleh homek76:

I wrote it a few minutes ago in another thread on these forums.

Beth games are nearly all about explorating and are lackluster in storytelling.

Witcher is the exact opposite. A huge and beatuiful, but mostly empty world, but great quests and quest resolutions. Witcher 3 is one gigantic cutscene with some exploration and fighting in between ;-)

Minus the movie cut scenes, those great quests would be a shell of themselves.. Cut scenes are what make those quests go.

Without them Witcher 3 is a horribad game with bad crafting and equally bad combat.

What a stupid argument. A film without the film is just a script ...
Fact is, Witcher has tons and hours of cutscenes that tell the story in a great way. And no, it is not all about the cutscenes. The quests are all very organic and well written. Look at the theatre-quest for Dudu, it is just great.
Crafting and combad is not very good, i give you that, but i repeat myself, it is a storytellers game.

[Red™]

Diposting pertama kali oleh homek76:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Eminem:

Minus the movie cut scenes, those great quests would be a shell of themselves.. Cut scenes are what make those quests go.

Without them Witcher 3 is a horribad game with bad crafting and equally bad combat.

What a stupid argument. A film without the film is just a script ...
Fact is, Witcher has tons and hours of cutscenes that tell the story in a great way. And no, it is not all about the cutscenes. The quests are all very organic and well written. Look at the theatre-quest for Dudu, it is just great.
Crafting and combad is not very good, i give you that, but i repeat myself, it is a storytellers game.

I just finished that quest! That was the best thing ever!

[FINAL_Bₒₛₛ]

But the cinematics and cutscenes are usually long like Metal Gear Solid 4 or just short but packed?

[Adeptus Lebowski]

Skyrim is for thilthy casuals, i'll say no more

[Where's The Lamb Sauce]

Skyrim has more "freedom" with what you can do but the story and characters are terrible compared to the witcher 3. Witcher 3 has less world freedom (you can't just break into someones house and murder them like skyrim) but its story and the way everything is presented is a lot better then Bethesdas games. W3 tells most of its story through cutscenes that go for a few minutes with dialogue choices thrown in for you

[monster19_92]

Diposting pertama kali oleh homek76:

I wrote it a few minutes ago in another thread on these forums.

Beth games are nearly all about explorating and are lackluster in storytelling.

Witcher is the exact opposite. A huge and beatuiful, but mostly empty world, but great quests and quest resolutions. Witcher 3 is one gigantic cutscene with some exploration and fighting in between ;-)

I dont know how you call thw3's world is empty ? did play another game as i speak i spent 50 hours in tw3 only exploring

[Kalvix]

W3 has about 99.9% less bugs than any Betheda game, actually has a story, and a better combat system.

I mean in all fairness Bethesda don't do RPGs these days, they do walking simulators

[hahaisfunny]

you play and you see

[homek76]

Diposting pertama kali oleh monster19_92:

Diposting pertama kali oleh homek76:

I wrote it a few minutes ago in another thread on these forums.

Beth games are nearly all about explorating and are lackluster in storytelling.

Witcher is the exact opposite. A huge and beatuiful, but mostly empty world, but great quests and quest resolutions. Witcher 3 is one gigantic cutscene with some exploration and fighting in between ;-)

I dont know how you call thw3's world is empty ? did play another game as i speak i spent 50 hours in tw3 only exploring

And what is out there in the world? Question marks that mark monster nests, bandit camps and "hidden" treasures. Yes, i too spent 50 hours in a complete exploration run, but that doesn't interfere with an emtpy world. There is NO enviromental storytelling which is the absolute strength of Beth games. Beth worlds are interesting (at last F3, F4 and Skyrim), every point on the map can be something interesting or have an hour long dungeon beneath it.
Witcher has nothing of this. It is all about the story and the storytelling.

But what i can read from the majority of posts here is, that there is just a war going on between Witcher and Skyrim fans. So, everyone already has their opinion, no need to spend energy into explaining strengthes and weaknesses of the game *shrug*

[Scheneighnay]

Bethesda games have very little depth because Bethesda focuses on giving creative freedom to its developers.