Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
It makes me miss the characters of Wild Hunt after finishing the story line.
Another great point in Wild Hunt is the complexity of many choices and how the game manages to hide many consequences of the choices at the moment you take them. Doesn't matter if it's the main story or side quests, there's many hard choices in WIld Hunt which you simply don't know what to expect until the consequences slap you in the face.
HoS story line is ok and intriguing, but is much more straighforward. No hard choices, not many choices and outcomes are predictable. Combat wise is a DLC that will encourage you to explore all game mechanics, has some tough combats and enemies are a bit harder.
B&W is a watered down Wild Hunt regarding choices, there's many choices again, but you see the consequences comming a mile away saving a couple of them and none of the choices is a hard choice to take in. Story is again ok, but somehow I don't care a lot about the characters to be honest...maybe the issue here is none of the characters is someone important for Geralt, is just another job. Side quests in B&W are same as main quest, there's choices but only a couple of them in which you really doubt what to do, most of them easy choices.
Combat wise B&W is highy tactical, enemies design rely much more in doing the correct thing than even WIld Hunt and HoS enemies, but you don't get that much damage so difficulty is low.
Summing up:
Wild Hunt: best story, characters and choice tree by far. Combat is overall balanced. Best overall IMO.
HoS: good story and characters, almost no choices at all. Combat is cranked up a bit in difficulty.
B&W: ok story but choices are very easy. Combat is highly tactical, but easy.
DLC is small stuff added to the base game. A new weapon, set of armour, a skill, etc.
Expansion is a whole new adventure separate from the base game.
DLC should always be free. Only Expansions should cost money.
While I had a true blast playing Hearts of Stone. I only wish being virgin to Hearts of Stone again, to be granted the gift to discover it once more.
One of my favorite add-ons ever in my personal and large games book. If not the ever best.
Not only for the story of Hearts of Stone itself, but the highest quality of the very W3 game engine behind it, a top notch game engine which can make anything almost as real as life.
I also would recommend playing Hearts of Stone before ending the base game, if you're a dedicated roleplayer, without being able to tell you why really, for I don't want to spoil the main story end.
Just for you to be aware they might not fit and make any sense...
Simple Answer......... NO
No to "BEST DLC EVER"
'kidding, B&W is not that bad, but not that good either.
I actually find it has a lot more heart and intrigue than the base game. There's too much soulless grinding in the base game for my preference, and the landscapes, while gorgeous, were very monotonous.
I prefer the contrast of Blood and Wine because not every quest is depressing. The base game is a bit too outlandish in the way everything was drab and depressing. It's no more realistic than everything being sunshine and roses.
The sunshine contrasts with a lot of the darker themes and creates a more interesting set-up.
To me, choices were true choices in Wild Hunt, having to chose between a bad choice and another bad choice. But I haven't play half of BW at the moment, so, I shall see.
I hope you're right, yet it doesn't bode very well so far...
Grinding in witcher? Don't think i ever done that... i just go around doing whatever comes on the way, sometimes play gwent or go face some enemies, or just ride around completing quests i seem to randomly find in pretty much everywhere i went so far.
Also witcher's life is supposed to be depressing.
If you didn't skip 100% of the cutscenes, you maybe would have catched that witcher's are ripped of all emotion and they can't produce children.
Also medieval times in general (even in fantasy) are depressing, if you cut yourself, you most likely die from infection.
When you play witcher in "completionist" way you really lose all the magic what this game has.
When you turn it into a grind.
Played it twice and read the books. I haven't skipped a single cut scene, boyo. I know the lore pretty doggone well.
Maybe take your hilariously 100% wrong assumptions elsewhere instead of inventing stories about how I come to my opinions.
Or, you know, read what I actually wrote about why I find Blood and Wine's story more intriguing, then practice a bit of comprehension and realize that it actually has nothing to do with a witcher's life. It would have saved you from all that time fantasizing about me skipping cut scenes and being a clueless lamb about the lore of the series.