Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
But still, he is against big corporate DLC money-grabs and shameless microtransactions, so for that alone he is good in my books.
Facts right? Nope.
Consistent scoring? Nope.
Better reviews than release day? Nooooope.
If I want a sketch comedy show rather than a concise "to the point" review, I'd watch him. He also has a terrible habit of going full on fanboy/hype mode on any game that is "his thing", only to turn on a dime come release and review time, when he realises that you should never trust hype blindly.
I would give DA:I a high review, thought it was a very good game. Then again reviews are subjective so nobody will ever be truely happy with somebody elses rating :D
DAI absolutely deserved 9/10. You just lost some credibility with me.
No way, DA:I is enjoyable for those who wouldn't know a good PC RPG if it hit them in the ass. They tacked on so much filler content, terrible generic story, messed up tactical view, crappy action combat with no depth, boring fights and boring dialog.