Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
bmg haven't swapped weapons out on specific characters for a very long time, it would be uncharacteristic if they did it for exclusively one legend with some mismatched sigs (especially since it's just one sig that doesn't fit the look of the guns)
Also, if they don't trade Thatch's blasters for a cannon, they should at least trade out that mismatched sig because now it's more mismatched than before.
Would you at least agree that maybe they should add it to experimental to get actual feedback from players and see the actual opinion instead of the few of us talking like this and pretending we know what everyone thinks?
Changing the entire half of a character moveset just because 1 sig could make more sense with the cannon (and it wouldn't, because it fires both at the same time) isn't a big enough reason.
And making a character more aesthetically pleasingand sensical and adding a new mechanic for more people to get in touch with certainly seems like a big enough reason to me.