Best Stance for Ember?

[Bioloreriel]

Hello, I was curious at what stance best fits Ember, I've been using a lot of speed but feel as though there might be a better option. Any help?

[Karinanima]

Defense Stance would be my best guess.
Unless you want to go full glass-cannon with her, then use the one that reduces defense, i think it was attack stance.

[ji]

There is no best stance. It's all personal preference I personally like to use the Dexterity stance on a majority of bow legends since it allows me to get the strings tighter.

[Karinanima]

Originally posted by wowo:

There is no best stance. It's all personal preference

-1

[ji]

Originally posted by FishOnTheInternetz:

Defense Stance would be my best guess.
Unless you want to go full glass-cannon with her, then use the one that reduces defense, i think it was attack stance.

You say its personal preference in your last reply. "Unless you want to go full glass-cannon" as in if you prefer to go class cannon you can theres nothing wrong with it

[Karinanima]

Originally posted by wowo:

Originally posted by FishOnTheInternetz:

Defense Stance would be my best guess.
Unless you want to go full glass-cannon with her, then use the one that reduces defense, i think it was attack stance.

You say its personal preference in your last reply. "Unless you want to go full glass-cannon" as in if you prefer to go class cannon you can theres nothing wrong with it

I may suggest it for the sake of "personal preference", but there is always a meta that negates viability of "personal preference".
I said that as in if they really want to.
But i am quite sure that Defense stance would be the better choice in terms of factual strenght and usefullness.

[ji]

Originally posted by FishOnTheInternetz:

Originally posted by wowo:

You say its personal preference in your last reply. "Unless you want to go full glass-cannon" as in if you prefer to go class cannon you can theres nothing wrong with it

I may suggest it for the sake of "personal preference", but there is always a meta that negates viability of "personal preference".
I said that as in if they really want to.
But i am quite sure that Defense stance would be the better choice in terms of factual strenght and usefullness.

I went into practice mode and did (a very lazy I will admit) test to see the damage difference between just simply losing 1 defense. So a sentinal un charged down katar sig will do ~34 damage to normal defense and ~33 damage with plus defense and ~35 damage with minus defense. So pretty obvious results but my point here is that the damage you take does not change to the point were you need the extra defense from the stance so the other stances are still viable.

[Karinanima]

Originally posted by wowo:

Originally posted by FishOnTheInternetz:

I may suggest it for the sake of "personal preference", but there is always a meta that negates viability of "personal preference".
I said that as in if they really want to.
But i am quite sure that Defense stance would be the better choice in terms of factual strenght and usefullness.

I went into practice mode and did (a very lazy I will admit) test to see the damage difference between just simply losing 1 defense. So a sentinal un charged down katar sig will do ~34 damage to normal defense and ~33 damage with plus defense and ~35 damage with minus defense. So pretty obvious results but my point here is that the damage you take does not change to the point were you need the extra defense from the stance so the other stances are still viable.

Viable =/= Optimal

In Dark Souls as example: It is viable to do a Soul-Level 1 playthrough with no Armor, Unarmed, No Rings and Items.
It's possible, but it's not the best thing to do.
Brawlhalla is pretty similar.