Assassin's Creed Unity

Assassin's Creed Unity

查看统计:
eBay_aDDict 2014 年 8 月 7 日 上午 2:47
AC1 will always be the best Assassin's Creed.
The first Assassin's Creed was probably the best game that I ever played on the 360.

I hated the sequels.

The tension/build-up in the first game was unseen in the sequels. The dialogue in AC1 was superb, along with the character development. The storyline glued me to the game, like a good movie. The landscape was so vivid, playing in Jerusalem and Damascus was amazing.

It's really one of few games that made me do research on the 'real-life' events that took place in that era, and kept me thinking about them for quite a while.

Following this game, noobs complained that the combat was too boring, and the missions were repetitive, I didn't feel that once. So Ubisoft spent zero time developing a sequel for intellects, but instead made sure these noobs could dual-wield blades, and have more outfits to wear and upgrade their stupid town and what not.

Basically, they made games with no depth, just a whole lot of cumbersome features.

The sad thing is, you ask any noob walking down the street what his favourite AC game is, and they usually say AC2, or Brotherhood. But it doesn't make sense. How can any sequel be better than the original. The idea has already been executed.

All games end with the first one. You don't create a game knowing you are going to make sequels. But devs get greedy and stupid people buy ♥♥♥♥ games and encourage them to extend the story, even though they are just creating more ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ out of thin air and slapping a price tag on it. Theres only a few exceptions to this rule, such as the GTA series.

Glad I didn't pay for any of the other AC games, the first one was the only good one.

Out.
< >
正在显示第 16 - 30 条,共 45 条留言
Old Skool Raver 2014 年 8 月 10 日 下午 11:42 
AC1 sucked big time. AC2 was superior in every way.
TheDoctor 2014 年 8 月 10 日 下午 11:48 
AC1 was a beautiful but boring game. Always the same missions, only boss missions are diferent.
eBay_aDDict 2014 年 8 月 11 日 上午 2:05 
引用自 Solid Tsuchinoko
I liked AC2 mostly because we are with Ezio through his life, more or less. I could care less about Desmond, but it was interesting seeing how a young and carefree adult could be suddenly tossed into a situation he was never ready for and how he comes to terms with it.

I don't understand how people get attached to Ezio's story.

In the first two minutes of AC2 you see his parents get killed. IN THE FIRST TWO MINUTES.

And then they base the whole story about Ezio getting revenge over his parents' killers over a period of ten years.

I never cared about his parents, and neither should you. It takes time to feel some sort of attachment to any characters in any video game. This is why the story was weak - you weren't fighting for anything you cared about.

But oh my, at the end, theres a woman floating in the air and starts to talk about the past and the future and everything in between, trying to make you think deep thoughts about something that should've ended with the first game.

All these people go on the internet and rave about how amazing AC2 is and suddenly the rest of the gaming community believes it too. So sad.
Old Skool Raver 2014 年 8 月 11 日 上午 2:23 
引用自 eBay_aDDict
引用自 Solid Tsuchinoko
I liked AC2 mostly because we are with Ezio through his life, more or less. I could care less about Desmond, but it was interesting seeing how a young and carefree adult could be suddenly tossed into a situation he was never ready for and how he comes to terms with it.

I don't understand how people get attached to Ezio's story.

In the first two minutes of AC2 you see his parents get killed. IN THE FIRST TWO MINUTES.

And then they base the whole story about Ezio getting revenge over his parents' killers over a period of ten years.

I never cared about his parents, and neither should you. It takes time to feel some sort of attachment to any characters in any video game. This is why the story was weak - you weren't fighting for anything you cared about.

But oh my, at the end, theres a woman floating in the air and starts to talk about the past and the future and everything in between, trying to make you think deep thoughts about something that should've ended with the first game.

All these people go on the internet and rave about how amazing AC2 is and suddenly the rest of the gaming community believes it too. So sad.

I base my opinions solely on my own experiences and AC2 was better than AC1.
MIND ЯEWIND 2 2014 年 8 月 11 日 上午 3:32 
for me the best and last Assassin's Creed was AC3
bears202 2014 年 8 月 11 日 上午 7:10 
Assasin creed 4 is the best in my opinion
highmine 2014 年 8 月 11 日 上午 8:29 
ill just say Altair was a master at hidden assasinations,Ezio was a master free runner,and connor is a tank
✘GreedoShotFirst✘ 2014 年 8 月 11 日 上午 11:26 
引用自 Master Disaster
AC1 sucked big time. AC2 was superior in every way.

Hardly when you considering the ROOTS of the franchise. AC was meant to be a game with promise of an open world enviroment with OPTIONS to find and stalk targets, etc. AC2 completely ditched this and became very linear with more a more cinematic approach and this only progressed as the series pushed forward till Unity.

In terms of gameplay, I can see what you mean, though. They did indeed improve A LOT over AC1, but the fact that the biggest factors that made AC1 were removed (freedom, options, etc) it made it feel disappointing to me. It was a sacrifice that I couldn't really deal with. I no longer felt like an Assassin that prayed on targets, but rather was told by the game and or people who to take down just "cause". The atmosphere of the game was definitely less immersive compared to AC1, too. The bright light-heartedness of it and the errand run missions at the start of the game made it feel like a parody at first, took me a long time to get over that. I felt the game could've taken itself a bit more seriously. However, I'll give it credit for being a great game nonetheless.
最后由 ✘GreedoShotFirst✘ 编辑于; 2014 年 8 月 11 日 上午 11:27
Ravagexe 2014 年 8 月 11 日 下午 12:45 
AC1 was a good game? That was one of the most retarded things I've ever heard so far...
It barely lived up to hype.
✘GreedoShotFirst✘ 2014 年 8 月 11 日 下午 12:50 
It was weakly executed, yes. But was full of promise that the franchise never lived upto. Instead the game opted for cinematics.
最后由 ✘GreedoShotFirst✘ 编辑于; 2014 年 8 月 11 日 下午 12:51
tamoni4 2014 年 8 月 12 日 上午 4:28 
I like AC2 more than the first game but there are things that AC1 did better than AC2.

AC1 was the only game where you felt like an assassin; Altair had to plan his assassinations, he had to do an investigation before killing his targets: some informants were giving him maps with guards' positions, their patrol routes, Altair's possible escape routes. In AC2 Ubisoft scraped that idea. Oh, and those ridiculous side missions - delivering letters, beating up unfaithful husbands, is that what assassins do?

The other thing that I liked in AC1 more is graphics, and not just graphics but also a camera work and filters, AC1 looked very cinematic. Graphics in AC2 were dumbed down.
Old Skool Raver 2014 年 8 月 12 日 上午 5:17 
引用自 tamoni4
I like AC2 more than the first game but there are things that AC1 did better than AC2.

AC1 was the only game where you felt like an assassin; Altair had to plan his assassinations, he had to do an investigation before killing his targets: some informants were giving him maps with guards' positions, their patrol routes, Altair's possible escape routes. In AC2 Ubisoft scraped that idea. Oh, and those ridiculous side missions - delivering letters, beating up unfaithful husbands, is that what assassins do?

The other thing that I liked in AC1 more is graphics, and not just graphics but also a camera work and filters, AC1 looked very cinematic. Graphics in AC2 were dumbed down.

AC2 wasnt about an Assassin, it was about the journey of a young man into an assassin over the course of 20 or so years. 30 year olds might not fight over girls but you can be sure that 17 year olds do and as a young apprentice delivering letters sounds just about right.
Jarilo 2014 年 8 月 12 日 下午 11:00 
I have to disagree. AC2 was the best game in the series. It was just magical, less dull than AC1, and had charm. It's gameplay also was less repetative than AC1 and the sound track was borderline Mozart worthy. After AC2 all the other ones were good but they were all just trying to always reproduce the magic of AC2 again. :gordon:

In fact, I would rate them like this

AC2 > AC:Revelation > AC4 > AC: Brotherhood >AC3 > AC1 > Liberation

Something about brother hood that ended up being the lame one between 1 and 2 of Ezios story once everything was said and done and also reusing a lot of AC2's soundtrack to boost itself that made it get pushed behind 4. Though...there is no bad AC game honestly, AC1 just had the weakest gameplay. 3 mission and then the assassination...rince and repeat. Ironically it may have been the first but I think it was the worst. Altair was more bad ass though.

最后由 Jarilo 编辑于; 2014 年 8 月 12 日 下午 11:12
Meturoido 2014 年 8 月 12 日 下午 11:43 
引用自 eBay_aDDict

I don't understand how people get attached to Ezio's story.

In the first two minutes of AC2 you see his parents get killed. IN THE FIRST TWO MINUTES.

Likewise people don't understand how you say AC1 is better than AC2, you don't have to though, tastes differ from person to person, and you don't have to understand, just RESPECT them.

AC2 expanded on everything that made AC1 so good, there was way more variety and the story was much better also.

BTW it shows how much you played AC2 with that comment, it takes like an hour to reach the point where Ezio's life changes.

引用自 eBay_aDDict
All these people go on the internet and rave about how amazing AC2 is and suddenly the rest of the gaming community believes it too. So sad.

You are sad because other people don't like the same thigns you do?? WTF?
最后由 Meturoido 编辑于; 2014 年 8 月 12 日 下午 11:44
eBay_aDDict 2014 年 8 月 13 日 上午 4:42 
引用自 Ōkami
引用自 eBay_aDDict

I don't understand how people get attached to Ezio's story.

In the first two minutes of AC2 you see his parents get killed. IN THE FIRST TWO MINUTES.

Likewise people don't understand how you say AC1 is better than AC2, you don't have to though, tastes differ from person to person, and you don't have to understand, just RESPECT them.

AC2 expanded on everything that made AC1 so good, there was way more variety and the story was much better also.

BTW it shows how much you played AC2 with that comment, it takes like an hour to reach the point where Ezio's life changes.

引用自 eBay_aDDict
All these people go on the internet and rave about how amazing AC2 is and suddenly the rest of the gaming community believes it too. So sad.

You are sad because other people don't like the same thigns you do?? WTF?

it's been years since i bothered with ac2. can't remember how long it takes for his parents to get killed but i know it happens right at the start.

Sorry, only a handful of people on here are really saying WHY they think AC2 was better. Everyone else just says "AC2 was best"/
< >
正在显示第 16 - 30 条,共 45 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

发帖日期: 2014 年 8 月 7 日 上午 2:47
回复数: 45