Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
IGN seems to be good at that somehow.
At least AOW3/FE-LH, tries to be different.
Maybe just me, but watching his videos gave me exactly that impression. Very Civ-like, linear and limited with an extreme focus on empire management. Have to agree with SouthLane, and it is refreshing to see games like AoW try a different focus. Just feels very samey, but still with some nice ideas as well.
Now you're just being silly. :/
I've won more than once, on Diety, without ever being at war. Barely even building a military, at that. Once you learn the tricks to Civ, it is an extremely limited and linear game.
They share common 4x elements but the execution is very different. Even in it's current, and very limited, state it's a pretty solid game both in terms of stability and game mechanics. The city/region mechanic itself is unique and requires more thought than most empire builders and in this aspect alone it's nothing like any version of Civ; the sole similarity being that you use a unit called "settler" to found your city.
Thanks, that's good to hear. It's just the impression I got from the videos I had seen. As burned out on that type of game as I am, caused some concern, but I haven't written it off quite yet.