Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I think that despite the fact I've devoted thousands of hours to this game, I can't maintain the focus needed to make it through hundreds of hours for a single game. I agree it's nice for decompressing the early game, but when it comes to stretching out the massive dead spaces that make up the late-mid and endgame stages? No thank you.
I kinda like it now. :)
I like it because it lets you explore "faster" and choose better city sites on larger maps earlier. Plus, as you said, combat becomes slightly more involved too.
I used to play Marathon a lot in CIV5, but as i got more and more busy with work and life and my time to spend on games decreased I unfortunately don't have the time to spend marathoning a single campaign as i likely would never see the end of it.
Listen, nobody will give you a medal for rushing standard. I am tired of winning on standard and feels bad. I start to like this laid back approach to marathon. When my plan executed full and I enjoy the game.
Standard is a rush stuff, it robs you of the fun. Again I played 99% on standard and I know what I am talking about
I think the total opposite.
Marathon speed totaly unbalance a game already unbalanced enough. If you're a beginner, marathon will crush you because you won't be reactive enough to adapt your build order to the pace of the game. Moreover, playing at marathon speed will prevent beginners to make any progress. You can only progress by playing. The more game you play, the better you will. And marathon is so time consuming that their progress will be as slow as the game...
On the opposite, if you're a good player, the slow speed will totaly trivialise an AI that already struggle even on deity difficulty level. Everything will be slow up except unit moving, so you'll just crush the poor bots by making better moves and have better logistics.
I tried once, to see. Will never again. Play dozens of hours in game, knowing by turn 400 that you have won, that nobody will stop you, and still having 600 turn to play... No thanks XD The game was so boring. I just struggle to finish it, and only achieved it because I'm stubborn.
Of course my opinion is biased because I'm mostly a mp player and not a solo player, but even at solo, I mostly play at online speed and advise to play at this speed. If you are a beginner, you'll make more progress because you'll play more games. With timer, you'll make even more progress. If you're a good player, you'll have more tight games. AI won't be better, but it will clearly looks better, because it's incapacity to move and place correctly its units won't matter as much.
Of couse, this is for players that want to make progress and/or have tight games. Some people just want to chill build their civ in their corner, have fun by placing their district as they want to have big bonuses and have absolutly no pressure. And this is perfectly fine ! The game is so rich that both approachs are ok. And marathon speed maybe an be ok for this ? I know I'd be bored, but I can understand that other people can like it.
But even if you enjoy this way of playing, I still think that you'll miss something by playing only marathon speed. There's 75+ leaders in the game. Even at online speed, it would take ~500h to try each of them. By playing marathon, it would take you ~5000h. Not to master them, not to enjoy them. Just to try them once ^^; I just can't imagine that... XD If I don't have my daily game, I'd be very sad XD
In conclusion I'd say the game is meant to be played... at the speed you enjoy it the most. And it will vary a lot depending on the people. And that's OK :)
Do youi play on huge maps with all max civs on deity ?
Try it on standard and let me know
Like I said, I rarely play against AIs. When I play against AI, it's mostly on Deity, unless I want a chill game, then I play on Immortal. Map size, depends a lot, mostly Standard size though. But yes I already played huge maps with all civs, not often, but sometimes, what's your point ? What do you want me to let you know ? I don't understand.
It's a lot easier to plan something with all civs. As era's last longer you get more use out of your unique units. On quick speed you might get out a unique unit that is already obsolete.
I'm not quite at deity on standard speed. I only just can do immortal with a decent start. Depending on how the barbs slow down the Ai a bit. Must use barb clans, or else the Ai just builds too wide and will run away on you.
Sure, it's a lot easier, we all agree on that I guess. But that's the point. The way you enjoy the game depends of you level. If you struggle at standard speed deity, you'll probably have a good game at standard speed Immortal or Marathon Speed deity because the challenge level will match your level. And that's great ! That's why there's so many customisable options in the game. So that your game matches the way you enjoy it.
The point I disagree with is that this point is not the same for everyone because we all have different levels,approachs and options.
And I never play at Standard speed. Only at Online speed. Much worse for you I guess :D