Página de la tienda
Sid Meier's Civilization VI
Todo Discusiones Capturas Artwork Retransmisiones Videos Workshop Noticias Guías Reseñas

Sid Meier's Civilization VI

Página de la tienda
Ver estadísticas:
Logros mundiales
naughtymoi 7 FEB a las 3:33 p. m.
New life for Civ 6
After the abysmal launch of what was clearly a terminally flawed game, I'm talking about the impostor falsely named Civ 7, it looks like Civ 6, as the last of an once glorious franchise,may have a few good years ahead.

Modders, get to work! We will respect and even try to reward your efforts.
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 17 comentarios
Rhapsody 7 FEB a las 4:28 p. m. 
People said exactly same things about Civ VI and Civ V.
#1
SenatorKelley 7 FEB a las 5:08 p. m. 
Bought Civ7, played it for 1HR and refunded. No tool-tips, terrible UI, feels alpha like many games recently. Rekindled my love for CIv6 for sure!
#2
Alkahest 7 FEB a las 7:44 p. m. 
Can't agree more
#3
Stormwind 7 FEB a las 8:22 p. m. 
*yawn* People have been doing this since Civ 4. Ya'll kids ain't been in these streets long enough to be allowed to post on a franchise this old.
#4
JoeWhizer 7 FEB a las 8:50 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Stormwind:
*yawn* People have been doing this since Civ 4. Ya'll kids ain't been in these streets long enough to be allowed to post on a franchise this old.

Yep, Mr. Fanboy, just buy this trash and waste your money. Its your money. From what I saw in the recent reviews, for THAT price tag? Civ 7 landed instantly on my ignore list. I will not even buy it on a mega sale.

Its time that we customers vote with our money. It is unacceptable these days, that AAA title for 130 bucks come out in such a stage. This is a scam. Just stop buying unfinished games. Maybe some time they learn, or go bankrupt. I don't care.

And I played Civ 1 + 2 as a kid ;-)
Última edición por JoeWhizer; 7 FEB a las 8:52 p. m.
#5
R.E.D 7 FEB a las 10:30 p. m. 
We need access to the dll, so we can port the tactical AI from vox on 5 over to 6. Then once 7 is better we need it on 7. Friaxis should just admit their AI is trash and let the community fix it. Win win...
#6
davemon 8 FEB a las 5:00 a. m. 
I can't comment on whether it's good or bad or inbetween at the moment since I haven't bought it, but there are currently over 8000 reviews in English with only 50% positive rating. That's pretty low, and I generally won't buy a title until it hits over 85% positive, even if it's a triple A title. I'll wait, it's sure to improve. If I am typical that basically validates what the OP is saying, allowing for plenty more good times for Civ VI.
Última edición por davemon; 8 FEB a las 5:01 a. m.
#7
Lokieys ★ 8 FEB a las 5:48 a. m. 
it's abysmal. probably one of the worst games ive played in a long time.
#8
Silent War 8 FEB a las 6:45 a. m. 
After seeing the reviews I loaded up Civ 5 & 6 to see which one I will play going forward until 7 is sorted out. Playing 5 on my lunch hour at work and 6 on my home computer - just couldn't decide. I like them both for different reasons.
#9
5n4k3d0cToR 8 FEB a las 7:04 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Lokieys ★:
it's abysmal. probably one of the worst games ive played in a long time.

Somehow, given the landscape over the last few years, I am not surprised that the latest release has problems...
#10
SlasH 8 FEB a las 8:14 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por naughtymoi:
I'm talking about the impostor falsely named Civ 7
Says the imposter... :steambored:
#11
jeremywyx 8 FEB a las 10:06 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por naughtymoi:
After the abysmal launch of what was clearly a terminally flawed game, I'm talking about the impostor falsely named Civ 7, it looks like Civ 6, as the last of an once glorious franchise,may have a few good years ahead.

Modders, get to work! We will respect and even try to reward your efforts.
you underestimate the power of human famnatics that are so worshiping a franchises that they will buy anything even if it costed 100 euroes.
#12
grumble 8 FEB a las 10:25 a. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Rhapsody:
People said exactly same things about Civ VI and Civ V.
(yawn) that is a trite and easy thing to say but it is different this time.

Always before you set out to see if *A* civilization could stand the test of time, This was a key concept that was fundamental to the franchise.

Now we have the silly idea that at a third of the way through the game and again two thirds of the way through the game the civilization completely changes. This may or may not make for a good strategy game but it is certainly not in the tradition of the original SM Civilization.

It may be a good strategy game but it is a SM Civilization game in name only.

I am going to try Civ 7 once a few updates and DLC have been released (because of my experience with Civ 6) but I think there is a good chance I will go back to Civ 6 (just as I did after trying Humankind)
#13
naughtymoi 8 FEB a las 1:14 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Stormwind:
*yawn* People have been doing this since Civ 4. Ya'll kids ain't been in these streets long enough to be allowed to post on a franchise this old.
Wanna bet?
#14
naughtymoi 8 FEB a las 1:21 p. m. 
Publicado originalmente por Alkahest:
Can't agree more


Publicado originalmente por SlasH:
Publicado originalmente por naughtymoi:
I'm talking about the impostor falsely named Civ 7
Says the imposter... :steambored:
How come? What or who did I pretend to be?
#15
< >
Mostrando 1-15 de 17 comentarios
Por página: 1530 50

Sid Meier's Civilization VI > Discusiones generales > Detalles del tema
Publicado el: 7 FEB a las 3:33 p. m.
Mensajes: 17

Normas y directrices sobre discusión