Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
The Iroquois most definitely. The lead a confederation of six native tribes and had more or less permanent settlements over a fairly large territory, while also relying on agriculture instead of just hunting and gathering. They were the dominant group in the Great Lakes/New England area. Another group would be the West Coast tribes, like the Haida and the Salish etc. They had a very refined culture and again lived in permanent settlements, though relying more on the ocean to sustain their civilization.
They were rather backwards compared to a lot of other native tribes. They never progressed much past basic hunters and gatherers until the Europeans showed up.
for game purposes it would make sense to have 3 in the long run (common names and larger groups is generally better or something a general audiance can identify)
1.) Aztec, Inca or Mayan
2.) Iroquois, Cherokee, or Creek
3.) Commanche, Sioux, or Pueblo (add a little variety)
But I'm guessing you knew that... so let's not do any more posts aimed at stirring up trouble, hmm?
The Sioux they could get away with being relevant, though the Cherokee would likely be more apt. On the other hand we've had the Iroquois alot over the past few games, so maybe it would just be best to use a different east coast forestland tribe like the algonquin who were big rivals of the Iroquois. Although if you want to get a really new faction you coould go for something like the Wampanoags under Metacomet. (King Philip)
Tell that to the Mongols...
I'm not trying to belittle them, its just that Civ VI seems to have a theme for introducing new civs and leaders so It would make since for them to try out something other than the Iroquois to represent the eastern coast woodland tribes.
And as far as anyone knows it is true that the mongols are not in. Their niche as horse archers seems to have been taken by the Scythians andI don't think that the devs really care all that much for mongol spinoffs like Kublai Khans China, or the Golden Horde.
Except unlike the Canadians and the Irish the Algonquins were a significant force compared to the Iroquois. I'll grant you that the Iroquois had one of the most centralized of all Northern North American tribes (obviously this was eclipsed by the southern empires i.e. Aztec, Inca, etc.) but people like the Cherokee were also highly centralized and would fill a similar niche of living in east coast forestland. Plus, the Cherokee also outlived the Iroquois as a power.
Being part Cherokee, i'd love to see them in the game.
Being mostly Irish.....whaaaaaaaat? Not significant? My Irish dander is up! Time to start chest pounding with national fervor!
Nah, it's true. We spent more time drinking and fighting amongst ourselves rather than empire building. Though i wouldn't be against an Irish civ with a unique Distillery District. ;)
The Irish had more historical influence than you may realize. Not having been conquered by the Romans, their society didn't crumble to the extent that others in Europe did. And when they adopted Christianity, they developed a strong monastic tradition. So they helped preserve a lot of the knowledge that other nations lost during the Dark Ages. Later, when those times were coming to an end, their missionaries started travelling around Western Europe, spreading some of that knowledge around. There even was a time where it was considered that Ireland should be the home of the Catholic Church, not Rome.
No talking down of other nations and leave your nationalistic crap at home. We don't need it here.